Update (06/21): WoodyBox found new
witnesses, which point on two different "quarantined" planes at
Cleveland Hopkins (see "comments")
WoodyBox ("Flight 11 - The
Twin Flight") new article is yet another groundbreaking
analysis.
It appears, that the majority of 9/11 Researchers and the 9/11
family members, who lost their loved ones, have to compile a new
list of questions about an airport, which didn't receive much
attention yet: Cleveland Hopkins, Ohio.
Among the disturbing new details are two flights, which apparently
had been part of yet another "mirror flight" scenario. "Both" got
grounded in Ohio.
One of them was Delta1989, the other one was identified as, most
shocking: "Flight 93"!
But there are also many new questions about some "200 passengers"
of that day...
The Cleveland Airport Mystery
200 passengers got lost on 9/11 - by
mailto:woody_box2000@yahoo.de Woody Box
Exclusive for INN Report -May 30
Inmidst the chaos breaking out in the hours after the WTC and
Pentagon attacks, between 10 a.m. and 11 a.m an airplane made an
emergency landing at Cleveland Hopkins Airport . Rumours were going
around that it was hijacked or had a bomb on board. The FBI
evacuated the plane and searched it with bomb-sniffing dogs after
the passengers had left. It turned out to be false alarm. The plane
- Delta flight1989 - was not hijacked, and there was no bomb.
However, a closer examination reveals a bunch of conflicting
statements concerning Delta 1989. Neither the moment of landing,
nor the number of the passengers, nor the location of the grounded
plane is clear. For every aspect of the incident there are two
different versions. Not one or three or four versions, but two.
This article will prove that not one, but two planes made an
emergency landing in Cleveland - in close succession. The proof is
based on local newspaper and radio reports from September 11th and
12th (mainly from the Akron Beacon Journal and the Cleveland Plain
Dealer), statements of eyewitnesses and internet postings in the
morning of 9/11 (people were listening to the radio and immediately
submitted the breaking news to the net). One of the flights was
indeed Delta 1989. We don't know the identity of the other one, so
we call it "Flight X"...
We start with a short summary of the events in Cleveland. At 10
a.m., the airport was evacuated. Without doubt, this had to do with
the rumours that a hijacked plane was going to land. The passengers
had to leave the airport but were not allowed to take their car.
They had to walk or got a ride at the highway. Busses were not
allowed to leave the airport. People around the airport were told
to go home. It was a very tense situation. These facts are
undisputed.
Cleveland Mayor Michael White held a televised news conference at
11 a.m., after the emergency landing. According to the Cleveland
Plain Dealer, he said there was an unconfirmed report that the
plane might have been hijacked or was carrying a bomb. But in the
middle of the news conference, he reported that it had not been
hijacked, and later in the day he said no bomb had been found.
This was not the only detail that changed in the course of the day.
In the morning, White said that air controllers could hear
screaming on the plane. In the afternoon, he didn't mention the
screams anymore.
We will now examine several parameters of the emergency
landing:
1) The moment of landing
2) The begin of the evacuation of the passengers
3) The number of passengers
4) The place the passengers were interviewed after the
evacuation
5) The exact location of the grounded plane
We will see that there are two different data for every parameter,
suggesting that we are dealing with two different planes. We will
omit the "a.m." because it's clear that everything is happening in
the morning.
1) The moment of landing
AP and two Ohio newspapers report a landing at 10:45 (1A). However,
Delta Airlines has registered 10:10 as the landing time and
Cleveland firefighters can confirm that the landing took place
before 10:30 (1B). Because Delta Airlines did not loose the track
of its plane, the 10:10 plane was surely Delta 1989. So the 10:45
plane is - by definition - Flight X.
2) The begin of the evacuation of the passengers
The Akron Beacon Journal writes in an extra edition from 9/11 that
the passengers were released from the plane at 11:15. This is
confirmed by internet postings describing the events in real-time
(2A). However, a passenger from Delta 1989 relates that she had to
stay more than two hours in the plane before the FBI started to
search it and took the passengers away for questioning. The Plain
Dealer has learned about a evacuation time of 12:30, confirming the
witness' statement. (2B).
Thanks to the most valuable statement of the passenger, we can
conclude that Delta 1989 landed at 10:10 and was evacuated at
12:30. Flight X landed at 10:45 and was evacuated at 11:15.
3) The number of passengers
The first press reports tell us that the plane carried 200
passengers. Mayor White mentioned this number on his 11 o'clock
conference (3A). He did not say how he got the number. The
passenger of Delta 1989 however, she must know it, made an
estimation of "sixty or so" passengers. This is confirmed by later
reports - the story changed quickly. Now, 69 passengers have been
released from the plane, going well with the "sixty or so"
(3B).
We can conclude that Delta 1989 landed at 10:10, the 69 passengers
being evacuated at 12:30. Flight X landed at 10:45, the 200
passengers being released at 11:15.
4) The place the passengers were interviewed after the
evacuation
The most reports say that the passengers were brought into a nearby
NASA facility (4A). This is the NASA Glenn Research Center, located
near the west end of the airport. It was already evacuated. The
passenger of delta 1989 however tells us that she was taken into a
"secure building at the airport". This is confirmed by a report
that the Delta 1989 passengers were interviewed in the FAA
headquarter (4B). Surely the FAA headquarter is not located in the
NASA facility.
We can conclude that Delta 1989 landed at 10:10, and at 12:30 the
69 passengers were taken into the FAA headquarter. Flight X landed
at 10:45, and at 11:15 the 200 passengers were taken into the
evacuated NASA Center.
Cleveland Hopkins Airport - note that the blue runways
were in planning yet on 9/11. The big black rectangle in the South
is the I-X Center
5) The exact location of the plane
This is the final proof that we have to do with two different
planes. Both planes were sitting on a runway, but miles away from
each other. One plane was at the west end of runway 28/10 near the
NASA center (point 10 in the map). This is confirmed by Associated
Press and an eyewitness (5A). The other plane was sitting at the
south end of runway 18/36 near the I-X-Center (point 36), also
confirmed by two eyewitnesses (5B). The geographic conditions on
the airport suggest that the passengers at the West end were taken
to the NASA Center and the passengers at the South end to the FAA
headquarter.
We summarise our findings:
..........................................................Delta
1989...................Flight X
Moment of
landing................................10:10...........................10:45
Begin of
evacuation...............................12:30...........................11:15
Number of
passengers............................69................................200
.....................................................near I-X
Center..........near NASA Center
The 69 passengers of Delta 1989 are (hopefully) alive and well.
Questions remain:
Where did Flight X come from, who were the 200 passengers, and what
happened to them?
Sources
(1A) Landing at 10:45
The airplane landed at about 10:45 a.m., but the airport
released no information about the plane's intended destination.Associated
Press 9/11/01
The flight to Los Angeles landed at Hopkins at 10:45 a.m., and
was directed to a secure area of the airport.
Akron Beacon Journal 9/12/01
Delta Flight 1989 made an emergency landing at Hopkins about
10:45 a.m., nearly two hours after the World Trade Center towers
were hit by two hijacked planes.
Cleveland Plain Dealer 9/12/01
(1B) Landing at 10:10
10:30 a.m. Flight quarantined. On a remote taxiway at Hopkins
International Airport in Cleveland, Delta Flight 1989 is
quarantined. Since early reports that a bomb, then hijackers, might
be aboard, Delta CEO Leo Mullin, 58, had nervously tracked the
flight from the company's headquarters in Atlanta. Every five
minutes, a new report came in. None seemed clear. Still, the flight
landed uneventfully in Cleveland at 10:10 a.m.
USA Today, 8/12/02
After treatment and transport to the hospital, reports over our
radio confirmed the south tower had collapsed. ... My chief put out
an order to return to quarters. He received reports there was a
plane sequestered on the runway of Cleveland Hopkins Airport,
because of a possible hijacking or a bomb on board. Responding back
to our firehouse my heart started pounding faster as we became
closer to our station, which is only a few hundred yards from the
south side of the airport. The second tower now had collapsed.
There it was a huge plane standing eerily still. Police, EMS and
fire are positioned in the distance.Scott
Boulton, Cleveland firefighter. The reports of the suspicious
plane on the runway obviously came in BEFORE the WTC North Tower
collapsed (10:28). A 10:10 landing time fits very well into
Boulton's chronology (set between the first and second WTC
collapse), while a 10:45 landing time contradicts it.
(2A) Evacuation at 11:15
The 200 passengers were reportedly released from the plane at
11:15 a.m., though White said the pilot was still concerned that a
bomb remained.
Akron Beacon Journal 9/11/01
A Boeing 767 out of Boston made an emergency landing Tuesday at
Cleveland Hopkins International Airport due to concerns that it may
have a bomb aboard, said Mayor Michael R. White. White said the
plane had been moved to a secure area of the airport, and was
evacuated.
WCPO-TV, Cincinnati, 9/11/01, 11:43:57. So at 11.43, the
evacuation was already finished.
"We have lost track of a number of planes," quote from FAA. From
Scott P at PTE - Just heard an unconfirmed report that a plane on
the ground at Cleveland-Hopkins Airport has a bomb on board with
approximately 200 people on board.
PT Cruiser Club Forum Posted by Cruisin in Calgary at
Sept?11,?2001,?8:14?AM PST (=11:14 EST)
The plane at Hopkins has been deplaned and they are going to
search it for a bomb now.
PT Cruiser CLub Forum Posted by Terry J at
Sep?11,?2001,?8:41?AM PST (=11:41 EST) . So there were no
passengers on the plane anymore at 11:41.
(2B) Evacuation at 12:30
After our emergency landing, our plane was directed to go to an
isolated area of the airport, and we waited for over two hours in
quarantine before FBI agents and bomb sniffing dogs came out to the
plane.Delta
1989 passenger's story
About 12:30 p.m. baggage cars and shuttle buses approached the
plane. The 69 passengers and nine crew members then walked down a
portable staircase and onto the buses, which took them to FAA
headquarters nearby.
Cleveland Plain Dealer 9/12/01
(3A) 200 passengers
The 200 passengers were reportedly released from the plane at
11:15 a.m., though White said the pilot was still concerned that a
bomb remained.
Akron Beacon Journal 9/11/01
The plane was sitting on a runway at the airport's west end with
approximately 200 passengers on board.Associated
Press, 9/11/01
A few hours after Mayor White's first news conference, FBI
Special Agent Mark Bullock confirmed that the Delta jet with 200
people aboard had landed safely and had not been in danger.
WCPN radio, 9/12/01
The mayor of Cleveland has announced that an airplane containing
200 passengers has been sequestered at the Cleveland Hopkins
Airport. They believe there may be a bomb on the plane.Metafilter.com
forum posted by turaho at 8:37 a.m. PST (=11:37 EST)
(3B) 69 passengers
The sixty or so passengers were thus able to gather some
alarming details of the unbelievable fates of the other two
LA-bound planes.Delta
1989 passenger's story The 69 passengers and nine crew members then walked down a
portable staircase and ontothe buses, which took them to FAA
headquarters nearby.
Cleveland Plain Dealer 9/12/01
The plane was evacuated of its 78 passengers shortly before 1
p.m.
Akron Beacon Journal 9/12/01( 78 = 69 passengers + 9 crew
members)
(4A) Interview in NASA Center
They (the passengers) were taken to NASA Glenn Research Center
to be interviewed by FBI agents. The center had been evacuated
about an hour before.)
Akron Beacon Journal 9/12/01
The Boeing 767 was evacuated and searched, said Della Homenik,
spokeswoman for Mayor Michael R. White. Passengers were taken to a
nearby NASA facility.
The Post, Athens, Ohio, 9/11/01
I thought the target could also have be NASA's Glen/Lewis
Research Center that is right next to the Cleveland Airport.The
news reported that the plane landed because of a suspected bomb on
board but they haven't released anyone that was on that plane. The
closed NASA and transported everyone that was on the plane there
for questioning.E-Mail Repository, posted
by "Connie", time unknown.
(4B) Interview in FAA/Airport
building
While our personal effects were examined we were taken to a
secure building at the airport where for three hours we were
interrogated at length.Delta
1989 passenger's story
The 69 passengers and nine crew members then walked down a
portable staircase and onto the buses, which took them to FAA
headquarters nearby.
Cleveland Plain Dealer 9/12/01
(5A) Plane at West end near NASA
Center
The plane was sitting on a runway at the airport's west end with
approximately 200 passengers on board.Associated
Press, 9/11/01
At the same time that we passed the Cleveland airport, the radio
was reporting that a plane had been quarantined at the airport and
forced to stay away from the terminal. There was some concern that
a bomb might be aboard. As we went by, we say the plane with a
number of vehicles surrounding it. Lights were flashing. We
wondered if there were hijackers aboard that very plane.Rudy
K, personal report. Rudy K was on the way home from Toledo to
Rochester, N.Y., taking Interstate 480. This highway runs parallel
to runway 28/10, a few hundred yards more to the North. The
I-X-Center is three miles away - too far away for Rudy K's eyes to
recognize vehicles. He was watching a plane near the northern
boundary of the airport. His report confirms the existence of a
plane near the NASA Center. Thanks to his precise description, we
can also conclude that he passed the airport at about 11 o'clock as
he began his ride at 9:30 in Toledo and arrived at 4 p.m. in
Rochester (with a little stop). Flight X was already there at 11
o'clock.
(5B) Plane at South end near I-X
Center
Kurt Voelkel, 18, of Parma watched as the Delta sat on a remote
area of the Hopkins tarmac near the I-X Center.
Akron Beacon Journal 9/12/01
He received reports there was a plane sequestered on the runway
of Cleveland Hopkins Airport, because of a possible hijacking or a
bomb on board. Responding back to our firehouse my heart started
pounding faster as we became closer to our station, which is only a
few hundred yards from the south side of the airport. The second
tower now had collapsed. There it was a huge plane standing eerily
still. Police, EMS and fire are positioned in the distance.Scott
Boulton, Cleveland firefighter. Boulton works with the fire
department of Brookmark, a small city south-east of Hopkins
Airport. His station is on Holland Street, just opposite the end of
runway 18/36 ("only a few hundred yards from the southside of the
airport"). So he is talking of the plane near the I-X Center,
too.
Click to
enlarge
Footnotes
The 10 factual data presented in the text are each supported by at
least two independent sources. Everybody who denies the occurring
of two emergency landings should be able to provide us with clear
answers to these five questions: When did the plane land, when was
it evacuated, how many passengers dit it carry, where were they
interviewed, where was the plan sitting at the airport. For every
answer, he should also be able to disprove the contradicting two
(or more) sources. I think this is very hard work. Good luck.
There are many rumours and uncorroborated messages around the
events in Cleveland. I want to present them here, but I endorse
careful handling as they are not independently verified.
White said the plane had been moved to a secure area of the
airport, and was evacuated. United identified the plane as
Flight 93. The airline did say how many people were aboard the
flight.WCPO-TV,
Cincinnati, 9/11/01, 11:43:57 (Mirror)
This message, submitted at 11:43 in the morning, is nowhere else to
find. It's the only hint that Flight X might be United Airlines 93,
but you have to wonder about the differing passenger numbers (UA
93: 33 passengers; Flight X: 200 passengers). Very obscure the last
sentence: If United Airlines told the reporters the number of the
passengers, why don't they submit this news to the public? Did the
airline tell them the number but on the condition not to publish
it?
[11:01] (temas) there was an emergency landing safely completed
in Cleveland
[11:02] (temas) potential bomb on the plane
[11:02] (temas) and it might be the missing UA flight
This
jabber obviously followed the radio or TV news. He refers to
what he's hearing, so it's not his own, but the radio's guessing
that the plane in Cleveland might be the "missing UA flight". Very
likely temas is talking about Flight X because Delta 1989's
identity never was in question. Note that the time of the posting
11:01 points to a landing of 10:45, too.
He said airport officials reported that a second airplane in
distress had passed through Cleveland airspace earlier Tuesday
morning before being handed off to Toledo. Officials at Toledo
Express Airport did not immediately have any information about a
plane headed from Cleveland.Associated
Press, 9/11/01
So we have another obscure plane in an emergency situation, and in
the light of the new evidence, we might ask if the Toledo Plane is
identical to Flight X. It seems that Mayor White was not the best
informed person in Cleveland since he changed his statements a
couple of times during the day.
A disturbing first-hand statement comes from
Virginia Buckingham. She was not only security chief of Boston
Airport on 9/11, but also CEO of MA Port Authority.
By 9:30, the FAA had grounded all flights out of Boston and New
York. By 9:40, all US flight operations were halted. As we tried to
account for all Boston-originating flights already in the air, we
received word that a Delta flight out of Logan, bound for the West
Coast, had lost radio contact with air traffic control.
When exactly did Delta 1989 loose radio contact? At 9:36, Cleveland
Center warned the plane to stay
away from UA 93, and this
USA Today report confirms that the pilot asked the controllers
to land in Cleveland shortly before 9:45 when the FAA released an
order to ground all planes. So until about 9:40-9:45 Delta 1989 was
in contact with Air Traffic Control.
Victoria Buckingham: I felt sick to my stomach. It would be more
than an hour before we received word that the flight had landed
safely in Cleveland.
So it took more than an hour after the lost radio contact that Mrs.
Buckingham learned of the safe landing of the flight. This must
have happened at about 10:45-11:00 and perfectly fits the landing
time of Flight X. Did she refer to Flight X? Delta 1989 landed at
10:10 in Cleveland, and it is unbelievable that the
pilot allowed the passengers to make phone calls but didn't
inform his airline about the safe landing. If Mrs. Buckingham was
talking about Delta 1989, why did she had to wait more than half an
hour to get the reassuring message that the plane and the
passengers were okay?
MR. SCOTT: 9:27, Boston FAA reports a fifth aircraft missing,
Delta Flight 89 -- and many people have never heard of Delta Flight
89. We call that the first red herring of the day, because there
were a number of reported possible hijackings that unfolded over
the hours immediately following the actual attacks. Delta 89 was
not hijacked, enters the system, increases the fog and friction if
you will, as we begin to look for that. But he lands about seven of
eight minutes later and clears out of the system.
At 9:49, FAA reports that Delta 89, which had been reported as
missing, is now reported as a possible hijacking. So again he is
--
MR.: That's 9:41, sir.
MR. SCOTT: I'm sorry, 9:41. Again, he is in the system. He is kind
of a red herring for us.
9/11 was a combination of older terror drills, NOT wargames!
Major parts had been also tested during Amalgam Virgo 01 (June
2001) and during three until recently lesser-known drills in
Westmoreland County, Buffalo and Dayton. These three drills had odd
similarities with the fate of Flight 77, Flight 11, Flight 175 and
Flight 93.