A quick background on the trajectory of Flight 77
The official story says that the steam vent retaining wall was hit by the port engine of flight 77.
The concrete was broken about 1 inch above the ground.
The wall was only 1 to 2 feet tall.
There were no burn marks on the grass, or other indications that a 757 hit this wall,
or that an engine (or plane) was this close to the ground here.
(see No 757 hit the pentagon on 9/11)
There were also several cable spools just under where the "plane" supposedly flew.
These reels are about 5 to 6 ft tall by my estimations.
They were not knocked down by the force of the jet, nor were they hit by it.
A Boeing 757 is about 155ft long, and the fuselage is over 13ft tall, not including the tail or landing gear.
(see boeing 757 specs and Pentagon trajectory)
The wingspan is about 125ft.

Flight 77 Port engine

 
click here for full size photo LARGE
Keep in mind the ground level, and that this photo is taken...
    1) Just after the explosion (supposed plane impact)
    2) the contour of the break of the concrete wall (where it is broken)
    3) The topography of the ground (the ground is not level, it appears to decend closer to the Pentagon)
    4) Where the other objcts are (the red light, and the cable spools)
Look at this photo closely, then continue...

Looking at the topography of the Pentagon lawn, it seems that the ground dips down a bit.
for the engine to have clipped this wall, the engine would have had to be inches from the ground.
Actually, it appears to me, that it could not have hit the wall, without hitting the ground,
and the aviation light shown in these photos.

also see...
911-strike.com/rebutting-Behreandt.htm
globalfreepress.com
some photos from...
http://www.geoffmetcalf.com/pentagon/pentagon_20020316.html
http://car.batcave.net/
http://www.asyura2.com/0502/bd39/msg/505.html

The Great Pentagon Insurance scam !!!! batcave 9/11 the Pentagon

batcave 9/11