Light posts at the Pentagon on September 11

As the official story has it, the "plane" flight 77 hit several lamp posts as it was bearing down on its target.
The thin aluminum wings hit these lamp posts, knocked them down, and the "plane" continued on its attack with not interruption.
the problem is, it isn't that easy.
First, I have spoken to a few pilots that say that this is absurd.
A plane going 500mph a few feet off the ground would make it almost impossible to fly, even for an experienced pilot, the ground effect alone, would create a huge problem.
The topography of the area creates another problem, there are raises and dips in the ground level. For the plane to "hug" the ground would create another huge problem.
That said, this magic plane, (piloted by someone who had trouble flying a Cessna),
kept control of the "aircraft" after hitting 5 light posts.
So lets take a better look at these light posts...

The Pentagon Light Poles and struck cab

The light poles supposedly downed during the Pentagon attack seemed to prove that a large object (757) hit the Pentagon. There was a well-reported cab driver who, while driving, had one of these poles fall on his cab, supposedly causing minor injuries.

Pictures of this cab were taken at several different angles.

In many of the pictures, there is a man with a white shirt and hat standing next to the cab, This gives one the impression that it is the cab driver, though I have no confirmation on this, it is what one would assume looking at the pictures. I guess cab drivers near the Pentagon normally wear a tie.

A few of these pictures are not consistent with the rest.

The pictures shows the cab at a different angles to the wall, and that the pole, debris field, and background are totally different.

In the image shown below, the right front fender of the cab is the closest fender to the guard rail. Also note the standing pole in the background; I will get to that later.



To the far right, you can see the cab driver with his hat and white shirt. Take note here that the white highway divider line is near the base of the pole.

Notice the concrete barriers on the other side of the guardrail. In the other pictures this concrete barrier is missing.

This image shows the angle at which the "white car" picture was taken. The yellow dots indicate downed poles, and blue dots, show poles which were not hit.




Hi-res photo located here...
www.af.mil/photos/images/bombing15.jpg

The above pictures show no concrete barriers, and also show the left front fender closest to the guardrail. You can also see the downed lamp pole in front of the cab, through the guardrail. If the cab was moved to a different location, then why re-enact the scenario with the cab driver with the hat, and lay the pole across the street as if the "crime scene" hadn’t been touched?

Now below, note that there is no white highway divider line visible underneath the car.



Look closely at the hood and roof of the cab, not a scratch!

A 45ft tall lamp pole got hit by a 757 going 500+ mph which uprooted this lamp pole from its base, the pole FELL on the cab which was also moving at the time, but hit only the windshield ?
How could this violent collision only hit the windshield and not scratch the car (which was also moving at the time)?
I try to picture this scenario occurring, but cannot fathom this to be the result.

Back to the image of the white car with the light pole standing. In the reconstruction picture below, the pole to the left of the overpass seems to be the one in the first picture of the white car. This pole was supposedly hit by the aircraft.

Also below notice the distance of the car from the overpass sign.

Image of overpass...

Below is An artistic reconstruction to demonstrate the original pole positions. The tallest pole in the middle-right of the picture would have been the culprit.









Notice the pole and broken glass? There is also a "T" shaped piece of debris that doesn't not seem consistent with the normal pole structures in the area.




Now we see a white line underneath the taxi, but none near the base of the pole!

Also notice the differences in the 2 pitures above. There is glass debris a foot or two away from the pole in the bent area in the first piture, but none in the second. There is also some debris touching the pole in the second picture, where there is none in the first. The whole debris field looks totally different. One more item is the curvature of the pole, compare these pictures with the white car picture, and you will see that the pole curvature is different.

car2.jpg
car4.jpg

The two pics above, are enhanced resolution images. If you look closely, the left side of the base of the pole, is straight, or flat.
It seems that it was broken off toward the top of the base.
This top pic also shows and "arm" attached to the light fixture with wires hanging out. This arm and wiring is not visible in the other photos.
In the second pic, you can see that the left side of the base has a curved break (shown in yellow).

So the angle of the car has been changed from the left front fender closer to the barrier wall, to the right front fender closer to the barrier wall. The taxi was moved from where the first pole was hit, to the right of the overpass, or the middle of the overpass. It also appears as if the pole and debris field were re-created. Lets not forget that the windshield was broken in the middle, but the car suffered not a scratch

This Taxi, the pole, and whole debris field were moved!


My original page with more graphics and photos supporting this.

The Pentagon cab scandal


reference pictures from

http://renovation.pentagon.mil/Phoenix/9-11-2001/Page.html
and
http://www.dragonslair.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/77/poles_.htm

911review

9-11 review Wiki

search September 11th articles 911review
http://911review.org/search.html

batcave 9-11 homepage