This hole could not be created by a large moving
object. Anything large enough going fast enough to break a
hole in the wall here, wouldnt stop at this point,
and leave nothing behind.
What was left behind will be looked at closer on this page.
Also since the words "Punch out" and other painting on
the wall has been a point of confusion,
this page will try to address that issue as well.
This may not PROVE the fact, there there was planted evidence, moved
debris, or fake photos,
but read on, and I think it may raise an eyebrow !
First photo of the hole...
(still smoking)
http://www.pentagonresearch.com/images/066-large.jpg
(Photo - some comments
) Things to note: 1)
No painting on the wall.
2) The white pipe bent out on
right.
3) The fire extinguisher.
4) No obvious plane parts.
5) The contents are not on
fire.
6) The perfect crisp edge.
7) The white board to the left will later
have an aircraft part on it.
8) No hose lines.
Run away run away, thats no ordinary rabbit. attack
of the killer rabbit, comming out of his hole (Monty Python's Flying
Circus)
And a circus, is exactly
what this is ! It would be a comedy, if it wasn't so sad.
Notice, on the above photo, there is a white baord with something laying
on it.
Now, notice this picture, the white board (left side of debris pile) has
no object on it. This is the
first photo (known by me) to be taken of the hole.
Notice the wire rebar and white pipes which are
pushed out as a "nose" supposedly hit it.
Go back to the photo above this (with the airport fireman), The
white pipe (right side) is missing ?
So no big deal right , they cleaned out the hole ?
Well, maybe, but lets keep in mind the timeline of these
photos.....
The first photo has smoke coming out of the hole,
For a timline, and to see how "plane parts" came on the scene in later
photos, see Russell's site at... www.pentagonresearch.com/exit.html
Now, there is not much discussion as to what the "official" story
is...
Mr.
RUMSFELD: Yeah. And then came in about—between about
the first and second floor over here.
And it went in through three rings. I’m told the nose
is—is still in there,
very close to the inner courtyard, about one ring away.
(Good Morning America - September 13,
2001)
Mr.
LEE EVEY (Program Manager Pentagon Renovation Project):
The airplane traveled in a path about like this,
and the nose of the aircraft broke through this innermost wall of C ring
into AE drive.
(World News Tonight - September 15, 2001)
. DoD
News Briefing on Pentagon Renovation
September 15, 2001 Mitchell: It's more to the right of where we were at.
This is the -- this is in a renovated section on the opposite side, if you
were facing the opposite side.
This is a hole in -- there was a
punch-out.
They suspect that this was where a part of the aircraft came through this
hole,
although I didn't see any evidence of the aircraft
down there.
who are THEY
?
Q: Which area is that?
Mitchell: This is right inside the E Ring.
Q:Did you see any evidence of the
aircraft anywhere? Mitchell:
Yes, I did. You could see just small
pieces of it.
Q: Well, how far in? Again, we're trying to figure out how it came into
the building.
Q: Can we finish the video first and then we'll go back?
Mitchell: You can see someone from the Montgomery County unit here. This pile here is all Pentagon metal. None of that is aircraft
whatsoever. As you can see, they've punched
a hole in here.
This was punched by the rescue workers to clean it
out.
You can see this is the -- some of the unrenovated areas where the windows
have blown out.
That's soldiers from the Third U.S. Infantry, the Honor Guard, are in
there.
And this is the conditions they have to work in.
There's the Tyvek suits, the respirators, goggles, and helmets, and they
also have boots on them as well.
Q: Where is that exactly? Between which rings?
Mitchell: Between the -- I believe it's the E and D
Rings. And that's the end of the
tape.
defenselink.mil/news/Sep2001/t09152001_t915evey.html
"I have offered engineers who were on
the scene to write an article for my website
explaining the exit hole since the Shoring Report and the Building
Performance Report fail to do so.
They also refused to do so. The people I have spoke with that were
on the scene
and seem to get agitated when the subject of the exit hole comes up.
One refused to discuss it any further saying, "A plane hit the
building....ok?" (from Anon)
Here is a different angle of the damage
This is the second known photo of the
hole. It was taken by a high level FEMA official.
Things to
note: 1) A single rubber line laid.
This is not a fire apparatus hose but a hose reel line probably from an
emergency box in the inner ring. 2)
You can see another bent pipe on the nearest side of the hole. The far
right pipe has been removed. 3) No
obvious aircraft wreckage in the space.
My observation, is that there is water on the ground,
showing that the firemen tried to put out fires,
not just with an extinguisher, but with hoses as well.
This also seems to be the point where the hole is being cleaned out of
some of the debris.
Timeline = second known photo of the hole.
My other observation, is that if this is the 2nd known photo, then why
does the photo below still have smoke, but seems to have less debris
?
Did the hole start to smoke again ?
The photos below, are no longer according to the
timeline.
though, this one, is soon after the impact, the hole is still smoking.
BUT, the white pipe (on the right side) is missing
The debris piece is laying on a white board now
So ,we will be looking at more, similar photos, keep this one ingrained in
your skull...
Now, this part was found in the FRONT of the Pentagon. www.pentagonresearch.com/074.html and was roped off for days, so lets just say, I don't think it
was part of a refrigerator that was smashed.
This was something they were concerned about.
As a matter of fact, since this was on the front lawn, it was almost TOO
OBVIOUS.
TOO easy to photograph, yet not many have commented on it.
Some have speculated that is the APU door of the
aircraft.
I don't think so though, as you can see, the APU door gets narrower at one
end.
So, we have 2 pieces of debris that are similar. IF,
they were both to be APU doors, they wouldnt be from a 757, as i said,they
get more narrow
(at least for a 757)
(photo taken September 12 paul disney)
1) No paint on wall.
2) What they claim is the aircraft rim behind the
firefighter above the larger hose. 3) The key thing in this photo is the windows blown above. The floor
was NOT breached between.
There is no smoke coming out of those windows as with the hole
below.
The windows are broken near the bottom and not the top as you would
expect. 4)The only place the floor
was breached was back in "D" ring.
www.pentagonresearch.com/045.html (see
the beige area in diagram).
Notice the photo below.
the debris part that we looked at before is there, but
Houston, have a problem .... Are there 2 seperate parts ?
One is laying on the white board, and the other still in its original
position.
What happened to this other part ?
Why was IT not photographed ?
2 seperate parts, at 2 different angles to the camera. (or is it?)
This part laying on the white board is shown in a better photo below.
(under PLANTED)
the green arrow is pointing to what looks like a muffler.
there is something that looks like a
tailpipe sticking
out.
For those interested, here is a closeup of what is supposed to be the
aircraft
rim
PLANTED ?
Looks like someone wanted us to
see this eh ? what happened to the first piece though ?? Are they
pushed together ?
What happened to the tailpipe ?
Things to note:
1) You can see that the white pipe on the
right has been removed.
2) Still no paint on wall.
3) You can see the rubble pile has been
sorted.
4) You can see parts now that they claim
are aircraft parts.
5) You can see two canvas fire department
lines stretched now.
Where is thetailpipe? is this a different piece of debris ?
and what about this photo, remember ?
large cropped picture below...
NOW, this looks like one solid piece, not broken in 1/2, and doesnt appear
to be the same part at all
that was so nicely displayed for the photographers above ?
Does this have the tailpipe object sticking out ?
To me, this actually more closely resembles the APU door
(or what is specuated to be) above ?
was it dragged to the front yard of the pentagon over 300ft for display
?
click
for large punch out hole no debris, but interior columns in the way of
trajectory this photo is taken near the end of the cleanup,
much later than the other photos.
Things to note:
1) The term "punch out"
now appears on the wall.
The person who took several of these pictures told me that
they painted that when
mapping the scene out and chose it as an arbitray
name to identify the location.
3) You can see the windows on the other
side of the ring.
4) Just office debris.
The Nail in the coffin....
Imagine if you will... a Jetliner going several
hundered mph,
going through at least 6 feet of concrete interior walls,
5 feet of steel reinforced concrete exterior walls, 16" of brick, 6" of
limestone
travelling over 300ft yet the fuselage didnt get jammed between the
ceiling and floor,
or get stopped by one of these concrete pillars ?
This hole is about 9ft in diameter, and about 310ft from the original
impact point of the "plane".
A Boeing 757 fuselage is 12ft 4inches wide and 13ft 2 inches tall
155ft long (not to mention the 125ft wingspan or 44ft tall tail
!!!) ( Boeing
757 specs)
This is what happens to a planes nose, when a BIRD hits it
!
Now THAT is a conspiracy theory !
The explosion is indicated to me by several
things:
1) The pipe is evenly rounded and not bent at an angle.
2) The two pipes are bent out evenly in different directions like a
blast would do.
3) The stuff is just "blobbed" out there evenly as if with equal
force.
4) The windows above are broken from something below not at the top.
And no smoke coming out of them.
5) The windows of "B" wall broken on floor 5.
6) The perfect circle of the opening.
7) The blast mark on the "B' ring wall without any chipping or impact
on the wall.
8) The obvious lies of the official story saying the nose came
through.
9) The near impossibility of any significant force from an aircraft
part surviving 310 feet of travel.
10) The fact that if you try and draw a straight line from the impact
site to the exit hole, you can't. Many pillars that remained intact are
blocking a straight path.
(photo taken September 12 paul disney)
