
There were many strange events around the day of 9/11, and many
strange photos following.
I will attempt to bring these discrepancies to light.
The page is meant for the reader to come to their own conclusion,
though I may make comments, these are just some ideas I believe should be
investigated
more in depth by our own Government.
site history,contact and
TOS
team8plus.org a Specialized Research Group |
News and politics at 911review |
September 11 Wiki 9-11 Review |
911review.org 9-11 Review |
September 11 search 911review serarch engine |
These pages promote the possibility that no Boeing hit the
Pentagon,
and give support to the possibility of a small plane, missile, or explosive
device.
Most of these pages are NOT analytical in nature, mainly providing
pictures,
ideas and links for investigative purpose.
While I am open to ideas about what happened, these pages are meant to help
bring light
to the photographic evidence and let the reader come to their own conclusion.
There is compelling evidence that the planes may have been swapped and /or remote
controlled.
( see www.Physics911.net
Operation Pearl ) and team8+ team8+

The gas tanks were 90ft apart,so there should be 2 explosions
90ft from each other,
not one central explosion which we see.
The damage to the right of this explosion was done only on the ground floor,
but look what is in the way? A generator
!
The wing couldn't have cleared that generator which was over 12ft high,
and then damaged the FIRST floor and NOT the second.
No, the plane did NOT nose dive into it, it came in VERY parallel
It hit light poles hundreds of feet away.
No, the plane did NOT hit the ground AT ALL, there is no damage to the grass,
or the cable reels which were right in the planes path.
This shows the columns bent OUTWARD.
While true, they may be bent to the left, they still seem to bent out.
In the middle of this photo is a burned tree stump,
the nose should have come directly into that tree. To the left is the impact
hole.
So the cable reels should have been underneath the fuselage,
indicating that the bottom of the "plane" couldn't have been at ground level.
Clearly the damage was at the ground floor.
The only way to explain this would be that the right wing was lower than the
fuselage.
BUT, if this were true, the engine would have gouged into the earth,
since the engine hangs lower than the wing. mirror
This scenario also would have made the left wing higher,
causing damage to the second and third floors to the left of the impact hole.
This clearly wasn't the case.Also see Pentagon 911 analysis
boeing 757
specs
There is a burned out generator just to the right of the collapsed wall
How did the right wing of the plane do damage to the bottom
floor
but not to the second or third floors?
The plane didn't dive bomb into the pentagon,
it hit several light poles hundereds of yards away.
Some have said that the plane was blown to bits on impact...Where are those
bits ?
Simplified sites to show the major problems of
the idea that a 757 hit the Pentagon.
Main Pentagon
analysis and theories
There was a large trailer just in front of the pentagon. This is confirmed by
witness accounts, as well as the ASCE report.
This trailer was in the exact spot that the pentagon was hit.
(The first photo below, shows the reamins)
How did the damage occur behind it?
How could any witness say they saw a plane hit the pentagon ?
Wouldnt they instead say...
I saw a plane hit a trailer in front of the pentagon ?
Supporting photo evidence
NEW analysis with previously unreleased pictures of the pentagon.
inside information from witnesses and staff just after the explosion. Pentagon
Exit hole analysis
more photos also showing the chair which was not burned
several photos of debris at the pentagon some seem to be from the
trailer that exploded.
mirror Several photos of debris, most have a curvature too small to be from a boeing
757
Response to Snopes
debunk urban legend page.
Snopes uses a photo taken several hundered yards away to prove that a plane hit
the pentagon.
graphic
images
that demonstrate that a 757 could not have created the damage at
the pentagon,
due to the trajectory and physical analysis.
mirror
Is this the perp?
This appears to be whats left of a trailer that was parked in front of the
pentagon.
Notice the rectangular shape of the frame, the crumpled piece of metal on top are
the walls of the trailer.
Another possibility, is that the crumpled piece of metal is the remains of the
aircaft that hit it.
I doubt this though. It seems more likely that this trailer had explosives in
it.
How did a
plane damage the pentagon leaving this piece of debris in the way?
Notice the curvature? Not the size of a 757? This doesnt seem to
be part of an aircraft.
Did a witness see the trailer explode ?
analysis.batcave.net/trailer.html
What is this peice of debris? If the nose of the
plane punched out this hole, would it be laying there?
Why is the curvature much smaller than that of a 757? FEMA did not catalog this
peice on its web page!
Sorry I havent updated the info here. My new calculations make this peice of
debris about 6ft in daimeter.
WAY TOO
SMALL for a 757 !
Even for the fragile nose cone.
Large photo enhancements of the
Tom Horan pics,
and similar photos, showing discrepancies of the impact area,
timeline of particular damage, and an odd piece of debris.
Plane
Reportedly Clips Light Pole
On its way to pick up Sr. Bush

In looking at the Pentagon investigation, this article hit me as a bit strange.
A plane hit ONE light pole, and the wing RIPPED OFF, leaving debris for 100 yards
and scattering fuel all over.
The Pentagon plane hit FIVE poles, hundereds of yards away, yet the wings
supposedly stayed intact
until it hit the building and created the "90ft?" hole on only the bottom
floor.
analysis
here. Compare it to the light poles from the
pentagon here
This is what happenes when a bird strikes an
aircraft
In the first set of photos, the plane was going 180
knots.
If the damage from a bird strike can do this, can a 757 at 450mph hit 5 light
posts
without ripping its wings off and leave no debris on the ground for over 100
yards?
Many of the vehicles were seen wandering around the yard.
The cars appear to have been
moved, why ? were they moved back again into the damage for a
photo-op ?Why ?
mirror.
There were at least 2 cars
in the area of the explosion. It appears these cars were moved, possibly for safety, or to get the fire trucks in place, but it also appears
that one car may have even been "swapped out" for some reason. The page shows
inconsistencies with the photos taken at different times during that day.
(It also provides a little humor)
Were
some of these photos altered?
This page shows the fire truck that was parked at the
Pentagon near the initial explosion. The truck is seen in
different places, being used to spray water on the fire. One picture shows the
truck being hauled off. If the truck took so much damage then how was it
operable?
Was the cab that was hit by the falling light pole, moved ? Different views...
supporting that the cab may have been moved...
pentagon taxi
cab and light pole
mirror
Pentagon security video CCTV Gate Photos - Fake ?
Reportedly 5 images have been released to the press.
PentagonAttackCctvVideo enhanced closeups of the
video frames
pentagon
video cctv cam Comparisons of different pics of the CCTV
frames taken from the gate video.
gate.1accesshost.com comparisons for the secuity videos from CNN and others...
Taken from a
video at CNN website.
More links on the CCTV video at the Pentagon...
thewebfairy.com/911/pentagon
more comparisons of all sources of the video
Flight 77 Dulles gate security video - hijackers
still alive
Video still of the Hijackers. These are the only known stills on the web of the
security video
my enhancements of the video frames...
dulles gate security video, hijacker photos
mirror
German Officials Claim- The FBI told them a Missile hit the Pentagon!
Two FEMA Pentagon photos could be keys to unlock cover-up.
9/11 pentagon turbine engine
Aircraft debris inside
the Pentagon
Is this part of a 757 engine?
Small Turbine Disc -
Reference photos...
Still photos from the Purdue
simulations in contrast with photos of the wall column
damage.
dicke.0catch.com
Closeups of the
generator . was it moved during the night?
Is the scar on top of the generator seen in the first photos?
Comparisons of wall structure, the Purdue Simulation, Boeing Specs,
Government reports and photos of actual damage.
Photo analysis of discrepancies of the damage to the Pentagon wall columns.
damage.1accesshost.com part2-graphics
geocities.com/greenmannowar/6.html
geocities.com/greenmannowar/7.html
misc pentagon photos
enhanced photos
High res
images and arial views of the Pentagon,
Naval
annex, surrounding areas, and trajectory of attack.
pentagon photos sept11
several full size photos of the pentagon on 911
Photos of debris and engine
parts from the Pentagon and the WTC - great debris
page...
81x.com/pentanew/debris
recomended pentagon theory page
911-strike also
killtown Questioning the
9/11 attacks
INN globalfreepress (archives) here (back
online)
Up to date news on Sept 11th investigation.
Physics911 Blogspot (my weblog)
Visit my New
WEBLOG !
Old archived logs
here
LINKS... 9-11 odd plane
routes/drones tailored to fly through FAA/NORAD radar coverage hole flaws
New 'Prime Suspect in the Mass Murders of 9/11'
twf.org/News/Y2004/0911-Rubicon.html