No 757 Hit the Pentagon on 9/11
The first
picture shows a "mid burn" photo. If the
plane, or even just the wings had "evaporated" or somehow burned
up, then, they would be visible. Surely these massive wings would
not burn in a few seconds.
Also keep in mind the placement of this generator, which is over
10ft tall.
Shortly,
but still very soon after the impact,
this photo was taken.
There are no wings, no large parts of the fuselage, no plane parts
at all !!!
Notice the grass a few feet in front of the pentagon wall, with
very little debris.
Also in
the picture above, the damage to the right
of the impact hole is only at the bottom floor.
The right wing would have had to clear the generator, meaning it
would have struck the second or even third floor, but that is not
where the damage is.
The columns behind and to the right of the cable reels are broken,
but at the bottom, and surely not enough for a wing of a 757 to fit
through.
This
is the left side of the impact area. The grass is
green a few feet in front of the wall.
Again, no large parts of a fuselage, or even small parts of a plane
at all.
Closeup of
the above photo.
The on rectangular piece of
debris to the far left of the
picture, has been identified as a contractors trailer, there on
9/11.
The rectangular box just above the yellow fire hydrant (still
yellow and unburned) is a metal box containing gas bottles.
(I have close-ups of these in other pictures upon request)
If the wings burned up, this would have been the location of the
left wing.
Also above, to the right and just above the fire hydrant, are some
branches left from a tree which was located here.
( a metal 757 vaporized into thin air, but a wooden tree
survived)
It is VERY apparent that the plane
(or lack there of) did
not strike the lawn.
The yellow arrow points to a
piece of debris i have on
this
page....
Which
does not appear to be part of a
757.
Here is a picture with an
SUV just a few feet from where the
wing should have vaporized.
The SUV seems unscathed.
Now to the right side of the impact
area.
Here is a
closeup.
No plane parts. The cable reels about 20-30 feet from the wall of
the Pentagon here not damaged at all.
Its important to note the "belly" of the plane is about 15 feet
LOWER than the wings.
The largest of the cable reels stand over 6 feet tall.
For the "belly" of the plane to clear the cable reels,
the whole fuselage would have had to hit between the second and
third floors.
This leaves the top of the tail section hitting the TOP of the
FOURTH floor !
no damage was done above the SECOND floor shown in the photos taken
before the collapse !
Though the angle shown here
is different than the accepted
trajectory,
this photo gives perspective to the size of the plane against the
building.
From Purdue...
Since we
know that the "plane" hit higher than
this (it didn't scrape the ground as shown)
and the right wing also had to clear the generator, this picture is
not accurate.
BUT, it does show the long fuselage ready to hit BETWEEN the first
and second floors.
If we take this to be true, this long fuselage, would have had a
lot of resistance hitting the continuous concrete floor, not just
going through a wall. Yet the
Purdue
sim
does not
take this into consideration.
The yellow
lines show the seperation between the
columns at about 10ft apart.
The "wing
root " is the strongest part of the
plane. This is where the wing attaches to the fuselage.
The wing roots would have impacted the wall of the building on
either side of this hole.
There is no damage shown here. (green arrows)
This picture also shows the clearance of the cable reels, and the
height of the generator. (~10ft)
The "plane" was supposedly hugging the ground, knocking over lamp
poles, therefore, it could NOT have dove into the Pentagon, so on a
level path, the right wing should clearly have hit the second or
third floor, not the bottom of the first floor where most of the
damage was done.
After
hitting so much resistance as the
re-enforced wall of the pentagon, and continuous concrete floor,
where is the backlash? The planes which hit the WTC both had a
large back-blow of debris.
There is virtually NO debris on the lawn of the
Pentagon.
related...
the
generator
and the burned
tree...
Main
Pentagon
theory page
Pentagon
911 enhanced attack photos
larger hi-res pentagon photos
Response
to snopes pentagon "rumor" 911
Still
photos from
the Purdue
simulations in contrast with
photos of the wall column
damage.
Photo
anaysis of discrepancies of the
damage to the Pentagon wall
columns.
Pentagon
wall closeups of damage area
9-11
Pentagon Attack 9-11review
ReOpen
9-11 - Catch The Real Terrorists