The Saudis Did It is a disinformation campaign aimed at deflecting attention from the fact that 9/11 was an Inside Job. It asserts that Saudi Arabia deserves a "very large part of the blame for 9/11" because of the funding by Saudi Arabia of fundamentalist Islamic groups, and points at the fact that most of the supposed Hijackers Patsies were from Saudi Arabia.
This campaign tries to avoid the fact that most of the Hijackers Patsies gained entry to the United States through a CIA sponsored program at the US Consulate in Jeddah (see Cia Visas For Patsies), and many trained under US military programs, and all of the other elements that show that 9/11 was an Inside Job.
By creating a plausible Red Herring, this campaign can be characterized as what Kupferberg calls "Stacking your Patsies" (see Truth Lies Patsies), which creates an alternate set of potential villains that detract from efforts to bring the real perpetrators to Justice. This "limited fallback" takes on various flavors depending on the level of intelligence of the audience it's aimed at.
Some of the chief exponents of this disinformation include:
The "former" Director of Capitalisms
Invisible Army contributed an important piece of the puzzle
with widely reported testimony before a congressional
sub-committee, where he identified Khalid
Bin Mahfouz as a
brother-in-law of Osama
Bin Laden. He was later forced to
acknowledge that his testimony was
"misconstrued":
Cross-examined on 15 December 2003 in the libel trial between Mohamed Abdul Latif Jameel et al. v. Wall Street Journal Europe, Woolsey stated that Khalid Bin Mahfouz had been 'misindentified' in his evidence to the congressional sub-committee and that the individual he was referring to 'was not Mr Khalid Bin Mahfouz'.
An essential ingredient to the "Ali
bin Laden and
the 20
Hijackers" fairy tale is for them to have access to riches
worthy
of the Arabian Nights. Not only do Americans not take anything
seriously if it doesn't have a pile of money associated with it, it
is essential in conjuring up a bogeyman for a world-wide War on
Freedom that the "enemy" appear to be formidably well financed. A
number of newspapers, publishers and authors were forced to
apologize
in Court for
spreading the disinformation about Mahfouz, but that's too lttle,
too late: in the American public's view, the connection has been
made.
From the page Truth Lies Marketing:
Meanwhile, both Baer and Cannistraro were lending their growing reputations as critics of the War on Iraq in order to bolster the legitimacy of the case for the War on Terror. At least that was the inevitable effect. Like Brisard and Dasquie, Baer and Cannistraro seemed to be informational Zeligs, showing up all over the media map, structuring perceptions in a very definite direction, offering legends and counter-legends intended for various audiences, both mainstream and alternative. On the broadest level, Cannistraro and, especially, Baer were advocating the complacency theory behind 9/11, posing as mainstream "critics" of their "former" CIA employers while at the same time keeping the general contours of the Official 9/11 Legend in place. In lockstep with the neo-cons, they were also raising suspicions of possible Saudi perfidy, primarily for the Saudi role as financial and political enablers of al-Qaida.
Canadian Broadcasting Corporation (CBC)
The CBC showed itself to be a fully-fledged member of the PBS
(Pentagon Broadcasting System) with the a 1 hour disinfomentary
done by
the
"Fifth
Estate", its premier investigative reporting
program
(their opinion, not ours).
Their
Conspiracy
Theories uses Canadian taxpayers' money to peddle the "The
Saudis Did It" disinformation. They dismissed all of the evident
facts of the Pentagon
Attack with the throw-away line, and spent most of the 1 hour
show presenting Brisard and Baer. As could be expected from the
CBC, they
repeat
the
CIA's canard that Bin Mahfouz is Osama Bin Laden's
brother-in-law, indicating perhaps that their script was written
for them in Washington.
Conforming to the Nazi Minister of Propaganda's [
dictum
for the effective use of propaganda, it has been
rebroadcast
almost monthly by the CBC ever since.
Unanswered Questions
The
UQ
News Wire, a banner of
the "9/11 Skeptics" carries a plethora of inane questions that they
supposedly want answering, that point toward a "The Saudis Did It"
campaign, such as: Were the Flight 77
Hijackers Actually Under
Saudi Intelligence 'Control'? when there were not only no
Hijackers, and there was no Boeing involved the Pentagon
Attack.
It goes without saying that an ulterior motive for "The Saudis
Did It" disinformation campaign may be the long standing
preparations by the US military to invade Saudi Arabia to seize the
oil. As an Internet commentator noted,
chaos
in the Middle East is not the Bush hawks' nightmare scenario--it's
their plan.
Cheney and Rumsfeld are both very experienced players dating back to Watergate, and when Cheney worked for Rumsfeld. Cheney was Secretary of Defense during Bush Sr.'s Gulf War 1, and used 450,000 troops for the much more limited objective of occupying Kuwait. They would have known, and were most certainly told by the Army, that 130,000 troops and 20,000 mercenaries would be insufficient to ensure security in Iraq. It stands to reason that they knew chaos would ensue: the "Incompetence Theory" of the Iraq invasion holds no more water (or oil) than the "Incompetence Theory" of 9/11.
The chaos in Iraq may intended to generate enough chaos in the
region to generate chaos in Saudi Arabia, and Iraq is an ideally
located base of operations in the region. Although the Neocon Cabal
is pointing their stubby fingers at Syria and Iran, the real prize
in the region is Saudi Arabia. And the only discernible foreign
policy platform of the presumptive candidate for the Democratic
wing of Skull
And Bones
for the possibly upcoming US "election", is Saudi-Bashing; he
appears
to
be be gearing up a "The Saudis Did It" disinformation
campaign
for an upcoming Saudi invasion. From Webster Tarpley's Rogue
US Own
Goal:
Kerry was also ready to go Bush one better by adding Saudi Arabia to the target list for economic warfare and possible invasion, a notion long dear to Likudniks which has been gaining ground among some US pseudo-leftists lately. Kerry?s prescription was for energy independence in order to obtain a free hand to settle with the Saudis: "If we are serious about energy independence, then we can finally be serious about confronting the role of Saudi Arabia in financing and providing ideological support of Al-Qaeda and other terrorist groups," Kerry said in Seattle May 27.
This may explain why there is
pending
legislation to reintroduce the
Draft in June 2005 (S 89 and HR 163).
See our
pages: Fahrenheit
911 Disinfo.
Links:
www.adelaideinstitute.org/