The movie is one big heaping helping of grade-A fertilizer.

As most know, Moore focuses on the business links between Bush and Saudi Arabia, Carlyle and the Bin Laden family. He accurately assesses several aspects of the Afghanistan/Unocal pipeline deal. Nothing he said regarding this was false, per se. However, Mr. Moore unequivocally states that "the Hijackers Patsies were mostly Saudi. He states that "Al Qaeda" perpetrated the events.

Nothing could be further from the truth.

Simple Sept 11 Physics will show:

1. The Building 7 Collapse and the Twin Towers were controlled demolitions.
2. No Boeing hit in the PentagonAttack.

Michael Moore makes no mention of these obvious facts, while toeing the official line that hijackers with boxcutters were responsible, even though they are Hijackers Alive And Well and couldn't fly planes. This is beyond duplicitous, it is an outright lie of omission. What analysis of the events of that day could be considered true while maintaining this absurd conspiracy theory that MuslimsSuspendPhysics to do what is physically impossible?

Why would he completely overlook the superior research of the many scientists on the web? Does Mr. Moore have such a low evaluation of you that he thinks his cut-and-splice pokes at the very loathsome GWB would make you forget that physics and chemistry completely refute the "hijackers" conspiracy theory? Does Moore believe that exploiting the victims' families for profit is the same as defending their interests?

Let's be completely honest for a moment, shall we? Fahrenheit 9-11 attempts to blame Bush, Bin Laden, and Saudi Arabia for everything that happened that day, and completely omits vast evidence that refutes the claim:

• There is no mention of: dancing Israelis, the Odigo warnings, the Air Force Standdown, or the impossible Sept 11 Physics Cell Phones.
• He fails to mention that FEMA's reason gave for the Building 7 Collapse was "we don't know why it fell".
• He omits that the FBI has said it has no evidence that the hijackers are who they are alleged to be, or their astoundingly patsy-like behaviour leading up to September 11th.
Your Ad Here
• He references the Okc Bombing without noting the bombs in the basement that Mc Veigh had no opportunity to install, or why the BATF were not in their offices that morning, or Martin Keating's book "The Final Jihad".
• He references the FirstWTCBombing without mentioning that ExperiencedSkeptics know that the FBI provided the explosives.
• He makes no mention of the CIA opium trafficking connection with the Taliban and Afghanistan.
• He omits all of the other reasons that show 9/11 was an InsideJob.

Why is Mr. Moore only telling one tiny slice of the story?

Because he is a shill, that's why. His purpose is to convince you that the corruption of our government begins and ends with the Bush family and friends. His job is to co-opt the opposition, to make you think you have all the facts because you sat through a single movie, to lead you away from the simple truth that Bush couldn't have pulled off what really happened without massive, organized complicity from thousands of players. Players like Mr. Moore, who is profitting massively from what is clearly a piece of disinformation. Players like John Kerry, Kathrine Harris, Dan Rather, and George Tenet. Moore clearly thinks that we have short memories!

Also worth noting are several scenes from the film that, when looked at side by side, created in me the impression that Mr. Moore has full support from the real perpe-traitors. In the beginning of the film we are shown comments from the floor of the Senate where Al Gore is presiding over the certification of Bush's victory. Several Representatives (all black) seek to formally object to the certification, but fail because not a single Senator will sign on. Not a single Senator stood up to defend the sanctity of the voting process. ...

Mr. Moore's job is to provide yet another patsy to hang the blame on. That the patsy is "the most powerful man in the world" only shows that the American President is really quite expendable. What possible forces could be at play to explain this?

Apparently, the "rabbit hole" goes much deeper than Mr. Moore is willing to discuss.

Some will argue that by compromising the truth enough to stay mainstream, that Moore is popularizing the cracking open of the first layer of the official story, which will open the floodgates for more truth to follow, and this is more useful than duplicating the efforts of those who are telling the full truth and staying marginalized as a result.

I reject this argument. This is why. If Moore was simply promoting "They Let it Happen on Purpose" (LIHOP) version 1, that is, the state of evidence for government complicity which was cutting edge in about Dec. 2001, then I could accept this argument. I still would disagree with the strategy, but I could accept that one might make such a decision in good faith and that for all we know , it might be a wise judgment.

But if this was Moore's strategy, then his prime pieces of 9/11 evidence should have been the Air Force Standdown, the Prior Knowledge, questions over why the Twin Towers debris was rushed away for recycling, how the administration could have had no idea that the attack was coming but named BinLaden within a few hours, why, if If OBL's guilt was so certain no formal charges have been laid, and no extradition order was sought, and why no inquiry into airport security - how did the Hijackers Patsies get aboard ? So that's what his position should have been.

There should have been a detailed expose of the Langley scramble lies, the Andrews fighters lies, Myers going on with a routine meeting with Cleland all through the attacks, an explanation of routine intercept procedures etc.

This would represent LIHOP 1, the early evidence, which has now been superceded by such issues as the proof of controlled demolition, no hijackers and the fake plane crashes.

But Moore has skipped straight to LIHOP2 - which is fast becoming the official line: The Saudis DidIt and Bush is covering up for his Saudi mates. Official story #1 is now too damaged and has finally run out of steam. But it achieved its task in providing the justification for the War of Terror #1. LIHOP 2/official story 2 - which are fast becoming merged as the same thing, are the launching pad for "War of Terror" #2, something from which Bush will be removed because he's served his purpose, and Kerry will be the new puppet.

Thus the fresh new lies of Moore are now more dangerous than the tired old lies of Bush. If Moore would simply promote LIHOP1 and do a good job of it, then while I would disagree with the strategy, I would respect someone's decision to make that judgment. But LIHOP 2 - The Saudis Did It, thus promoting "War of Terror" #2 - get the real terrorists now - must be opposed with the same vigour as the original official story.

A closing observation. We, the genuine investigators have slaved away for years, not taking a cent in most cases, often losing money from taking time off work to do what we do - to bring forward the best quality evidence we can.

Moore then rides our coat-tails , making a personal fortune by stealing our work, which would bad enough even if he was presenting it accurately, but then distorts it, through careful editing, into something which will promote exactly what we've been working so hard to try to head off.

Can you say "scumbag"?