|
Web Site:
Home
Page
Search
Summary
Donations
+ about
us
Essays
Viewpoints
Translate
Whats
New ?
About
Posters
911Review.Com
Top Topics:
FrontPage
911
Review
Posters
Conspiracy
Of Silence
Political
Art
Anthrax
Attacks
InsideJob
Leahy
Vs Ashcroft 200406
McMedia
Patriot
Act
Building
7
Collapse
Guardian
Muslims
Suspend Physics
Latest
Headlines
Ongoing
Coverup
Air
Force Standdown
Coverup
By WhiteHouse
Flight
77 BlackBoxes
Flights
In
His Own Words
Insider
Trading
Open
And Fair Trials
Pentagon
Attack Cctv Video
Prior
Knowledge
Osama
Bin
Asset
BinLaden
Bin
Laden Confession
Cia
Visas For Patsies
Experienced
Skeptics
Hijackers
Alive And Well
Hijackers
Patsies
Pentagon
Attack
Flight
77
Flight
77 Sites
Pentagon
Attack Damage
Pentagon
Attack Debris
Pentagon
Attack Fire
Pentagon
Attack Legend
PentagonMascal
PentagonPlaneRotor
Pentagon
Strike
Flight
77 Patsies
Flight
77 Witnesses
Killtown
Pentagon
Attack Hole
Pentagon
Attack Videos
Pentagon
Attack Witnesses Blast
Sept
11 Web
Sites
Grable,Rosalee
Trusted
News
Sites
Twin
Towers
Whats
Next
Bin
Laden
Confession
Big
Darkness
Come Soon
Aedpa
Bertrand
Russell Tribunal
Oklahoma-Connection
Mohamed-El-Atriss
93
Somerset
CSBA
NIPP
LEVIN
MYERS
NELSON
Black
Boxes FBI
Pentagon
Attack Videos
Capps
For
Canadians
Fraudulent
Legislation
Fahrenheit
9/11 Disinfo
Mc Media
ChapBooks
More
topics...
News:
911
Ommission TortureAct
Canadas
Patriot Act3 
Chemtrails
Over Ottawa 
Trusted
News
Sites
Essays:
Bogus
War
On Terrorism
Fema
The Secret Government
Truth
Lies
Legendof 9/11
DU
Trojan
Horse
Viewpoints:
Conspiracy
Of Silence
Fraudulent
Legislation 
WhatsNext
Stanley
Hilton Lawsuit
Mirrors:
geocities.com/killtown
elitewatch.netfirms.com
lightscion.com
baltech.org/lederman
angieon911.com
|
|
Kerosene
fires do not burn hot. Only high explosive and shaped charges generate
huge amount of heat, and depleted uranium (DU) is a incendiary that is
added to warheads to increase their penetrating ability. Uranium is pyrophoric
i.e. it burns fiercely in air, igniting at temperatures over 500 oC
and fires that result from a DU warhead burn at 2000-5000 oC.
A decade ago, DU was heavily used mainly in anti-tank ordnance, because
it increases the penetrating power significantly. Since that time it
has been widely adopted for use in much of the US arsenal. Its use has
been integrated into the design of "shaped-charges". Recent
"bunker-buster" warheads may contain a [http://www.fas.org/man/dod-101/sys/smart/agm-154.htm
1/2 tonne of DU], in addition to the explosive warhead.
Xymphora's
blog has a summary on the possible usage of DU in the
Pentagon attack:
The
debate about whether Flight 77 or something else hit the Pentagon takes
on a new meaning if we consider the possible use of a missile
containing depleted
uranium.
There is quite a lot of debate on the issue, but depleted uranium is
probably relatively safe unless it catches fire. It has a tendency to
catch fire on impact, and the burning seems to make it more effective
as a piercing weapon. Depleted uranium is sometimes used in commercial
aircraft (but apparently not in the Boeing 757), but is really put to
extensive use in bombs and cruise missiles. When it makes contact with
its target and catches fire, the uranium turns into an aerosol, which
is likely to be extremely toxic if inhaled. The use of depleted uranium
in Serbia, Bosnia and Iraq has probably caused increased rates of
cancer and birth defects (needless to say, NATO and the US government
dispute this ).
Depleted uranium may
even be the culprit behind Gulf War Syndrome. There are campaigns to
ban the use of depleted uranium in bombs
and missiles.
One of the reasons it is so popular is that its use in weapons provides
a cheap way to dispose of nuclear waste, killing, as it were, two birds
with one stone. Of course, the fact that depleted uranium tends to burn
on contact with its target may explain why no debris was found in the
Pentagon (and the ability of DU to provide punching power through even
the toughest materials may explain how the missile penetrated into the
Pentagon as far as it did). The possible presence of depleted uranium
aerosol raises an important safety issue, an issue ignored by those who
are certain that it was Flight 77 that hit the Pentagon. Were the
people who put out the fire, cleaned up the damage, and rebuilt the
Pentagon properly protected? Were the people working in the Pentagon
near the crash site subjected to dangerous levels of a toxic substance?
Some of the photos of
the debris removal work at the Pentagon long after the attack indicate
that they are taking extraordinary
precautions against contamination, perhaps for this very
reason. Notice the use of full
gas masks, coveralls and disposable outer covers on their boots.
>Links:
|