Alex
Constantine
Alex Constantine open
index
Meet Jerome Hauer, 9/11 Suspect Awaiting Indictment
Ladies and Gentlemen,
meet Jerome
Hauer, director of the Office of Public Health
Preparedness.
On September 11, 2001, Jerome Hauer was a national security advisor
with the National Institute of Health, a managing director with
Kroll Associates, and a guest on national television. His
background in counter-terror and his specialized knowledge of
biological warfare served him well on that day. Perhaps a little
too well.
Anthrax Attacks
On September 11, 2001, Jerome Hauer advised the White House to
begin taking Cipro, an antibiotic which is effective against
anthrax.
Mr. Hauer's advice was not made public. Its value may have been
underestimated at the time, but it was clearly demonstrated a week
later, when the first anthrax
letters appeared, and again three weeks after that, when anthrax
appeared in letters to Democratic Senators Daschle and Leahy.
The obvious question is: Did Jerome Hauer know about the anthrax
attacks in advance?
Prior Knowledge?
Strangely, perhaps, this is not the first time questions of prior
knowledge have surfaced in Jerome Hauer's wake.
Jerome Hauer joined New York City's Office of Emergency Management
(OEM) in 1998 and quickly obtained funding from the office of
then-mayor Rudy Giuliani for the study of West Nile virus. The
following year the virus appeared in the city, and Jerome Hauer led
the fumigation effort.
Did Jerome Hauer know this was going to
happen? Or did he just get "lucky"?
And how could anyone know such a thing was going to happen? Unless
... unless ...
The Sound Of Two Feet Dragging
Strangely, perhaps,
Jerome Hauer managed the NIH response to the anthrax attacks. The
anthrax used in the attacks was identified as an Ames
strain, which means it had to have come from the U.S.
Army Medical Research Institute of Infectious Diseases
(USAMRIID) at Fort Detrick, Maryland.
Jerome Hauer received relatively good information for tracking down
the origin of the anthrax. He even got a list of people from
various institutes, including USAMRIID at Fort Detrick. But his
response was slow and hidden behind a public relations campaign
spreading Orwellian claims like "Suspects are Osama bin Laden
and his Al-Q'aeda network and sympathizers to US right wing
extremists".
Why would he act so slowly, and in such an inappropriate fashion?
Perhaps because Jerome Hauer knew someone whose name was on that
list?
Stephen Hatfill, at one time considered a prime suspect in this
still-unsolved case, had worked for USAMRIID at Fort Detrick.
Strangely, perhaps, he had also worked with Jerome Hauer, for
Scientific Applications International Corporation, at the
Center for Counterterrorism Technology and
Analysis.
The World Trade Center
Jerome Hauer's connections with terror and counter-terror started
with and concentrated on biological warfare, but they don't stop
there.
On September 11, 2001, in addition to his job with the NIH, Jerome
Hauer was also Managing Director of Kroll Associates, a
well-established security firm serving clients in the military and
the US government. In the 1980s, Kroll was known as the "CIA of
Wall Street" because of the sorts of the people it hired, and the
sorts of tasks they were assigned.
Strangely, perhaps, on 9/11, Kroll was in charge of security for
the entire World Trade Center complex.
The head of security at the WTC on September 11, 2001, was former
FBI counter-terror specialist John P.
O'Neill.
O'Neill, considered the world's leading expert on Osama bin Laden,
had resigned his post as Deputy Director of the FBI during the
summer, very unhappy with the Bush administration's head-in-sand
"approach" to terror, after investigations into Osama bin Laden and
al-Q'aeda had been blocked.
Who Killed John O'Neill?
John O'Neill started his
new job at the WTC on September 10, 2001, the day before he was
killed there. His having landed that particular job at that
particular time raises some very interesting questions.
Among them: Why does this matter?
If, as many people believe, 9/11 was a false-flag operation
designed to implicate Osama bin Laden, then a legend, or a cover
story, involving bin Laden would have to be fabricated,
disseminated very quickly, and swallowed whole -- not just by the
American people but by the people of the world.
And John O'Neill was a most -- if not the
most -- formidable obstacle in the way of such a cover story.
He was not only the world's leading expert on bin Laden, but he was
also regarded as a "loose cannon", because of his record of working
outside normal channels when normal channels were "blocked". He
knew FBI investigations into bin Laden and al-Q'aeda had been shut
down in the summer of 2001 and it is extremely unlikely that he
would have remained quiet about it. He also knew whether or not
Osama bin Laden was capable of inflicting the amount of damage the
US suffered on 9/11.
In other words, if the conspirators were hoping to spread a Big Lie
about Osama bin Laden, they would have had a short list of things
they absolutely had to do.
Surely, one of the items on that list would be to silence John
O'Neill.
And what better way than to entomb him at the scene of the
crime?
So many questions!
Who got John O'Neill the WTC job?
Strangely, perhaps, John O'Neill was lured to the WTC position by
his old friend Jerome Hauer, Managing Director of Kroll.
Very strange indeed, don't you think?
National Television
Which employer -- if any -- was Jerome Hauer representing on the
morning of September 11, 2001, when he slipped the seeds of the
official conspiracy theory to Dan Rather and his viewers on
CBS?
A few weeks ago I
blogged about a video which was
hosted at Google at the time but which has now been taken down.
Fortunately I was able to obtain transcripts from the video while
it was available.
[UPDATE: The
video is now available again, at YouTube, and it will be
embedded below if possible.]
One segment of the video [starting at 2:30] documents the following
exchange, from the morning of September 11, 2001:
Dan Rather: Based on what you
know, and I recognize we’re dealing with so few facts, is it
possible that just a plane crash could have collapsed these
buildings, or would it have required the, sort of, prior
positioning of other explosives in the, uh, in the buildings? I
mean, what do you think?
Jerome Hauer: No, I, uh, my sense is just the
velocity of the plane and the fact that you have a plane filled
with fuel hitting that building, uh, that burned, uh, the velocity
of that plane, uh, certainly, uh, uh, had an impact on the
structure itself, and then the fact that it burned and you had that
intense heat, uh, probably weakened the structure as well, uh, and
I think it, uh, was, uh, simply the, uh, the planes hitting the
buildings, and, and causing the collapse.
Jerome Hauer is certainly a remarkable guest, isn't he? On the very
morning of the event, he had the whole thing figured out.
The collapse was simply due to the planes hitting the buildings, just
the velocity of the plane and of course the fact that it was
filled with fuel, and the
fact that it burned and of course you had
that intense heat which must have weakened
the structure ... It's incredible, of course. It's also half
of the official story!
But let's get back to the attack itself. Who did it? Who
could have done it? If you were watching
CBS that morning, you would have heard this:
Dan Rather: What perspective
can you give us? I mean, there have been these repeated reports
that, well, yes, Osama Bin Laden, but some think he’s been
over-emphasized as, as responsible for these kinds of events. I
know many intelligence, uh, people at very high levels who say,
listen, you can’t have these kinds of attacks without having
some state, Iraq, Iran, Libya, Syria, somebody involved. Put that
into perspective for us.
Jerome Hauer: Yeah, well I’m not sure
I agree that, umm, this is necessarily state-sponsored. Umm, it, as
I mentioned earlier, certainly has, umm, the, uh, fingerprints of
somebody like Bin Laden.
And that, of course, is the other half of the official story.
How did Dan Rather happen to have a guest with him on the morning
of 9/11 who knew the entire official story
before it became public
knowledge?
Jerome Hauer was introduced to CBS's viewers as a former director
of NYC's OEM. Strangely, perhaps, CBS News audiences were not told
he was also a managing director of the security company responsible
for the twin towers. And of course no one was told to start taking
Cipro -- except the White House.
Planting The Seeds
The twin disintegrations of the twin towers certainly looked like
explosives-driven demolitions to many reporters who covered covered
them live -- but Jerome Hauer assured Dan Rather and his viewers
that it was just caused by the intense heat
that weakened the structure!
The attack of 9/11 was of such scope and ferocity that it was
virtually unimaginable -- except to the people who planned it --
just a day before it happened. But when it did happen, Jerome Hauer
was able to contradict the intelligence experts and claim it bore
the fingerprints of somebody like Bin
Laden!
Jerome Hauer knew the entire official story
before it became public
knowledge.
Jerome Hauerhelped
the official story become public
knowledge!
Watering The Seeds
In November of 2001,
Jerome Hauer participated in the Council on Foreign Relations'
"Independent Task Force on America's Response to
Terrorism", along with Henry A. Kissinger and others; their
task included the following items:
- Release a White Paper explaining our goals and rationale for
the war in Afghanistan, and outlining the evidence that the
al-Qa'eda network was responsible for the 9/11 attacks
- Disseminate stories of particular victims to convey the range
of people killed in the 9/11 attacks -- stress range of religions,
races, income levels, etc.
- Counteract [the] myth that Mossad was behind the attacks by
showing Jews killed, etc.
- Routinely monitor the regional press in real time to enable
prompt responses
Routinely Monitor This!!
You have a plane filled with fuel hitting that
building, the velocity of that plane certainly had an impact on the
structure itself, and then the fact that it burned and you had that
intense heat, probably weakened the structure as well, and I think
it was simply the the planes hitting the buildings and causing the
collapse.
...
I’m not sure I agree that this is necessarily
state-sponsored. It certainly has the fingerprints of somebody like
Bin Laden.
Yeah, sure it does! Really, Jerome -- we believe
you!
No, we don't!
Book 'em, Danno!
http://winterpatriot.blogspot.com/2007/02/meet-jerome-hauer-911-suspect-awaiting.html
~~~
[SEE ALSO]
Jerome
Hauer
CRUCIAL
VIDEO: Who Killed John O'Neill?
9/11
Encyclopedia: Hauer, Jerome
9/11
Encyclopedia: Kroll Associates
Mysterious September 11 Breakfast Meeting on Capitol Hill
Daniel Pearl and the Paymaster of 9/11
Saic
Who Killed John
O'Neill
Tommy Thompson - 9/11Encyclopedia
The 9/11 "Truth" Movement on
The Air force Standown War-Games
make a statement
political art at
911review.org
Government does NOT want you to visit these 10 websites
Strangely, perhaps,
Jerome Hauer managed the NIH response to the anthrax attacks. The
anthrax used in the attacks was identified as an Ames
strain, which means it had to have come from the U.S.
Army Medical Research Institute of Infectious Diseases
(USAMRIID) at Fort Detrick, Maryland.
John O'Neill started his
new job at the WTC on September 10, 2001, the day before he was
killed there. His having landed that particular job at that
particular time raises some very interesting questions.
In November of 2001,
Jerome Hauer participated in the Council on Foreign Relations'
"Independent Task Force on America's Response to
Terrorism", along with Henry A. Kissinger and others; their
task included the following items: