WHY
DID THE US DEVELOP THE SPACE SHUTTLE
WHEN THE SATURN 5 IS SO MUCH BETTER?
The Space Shuttle has a lift off thrust of 6.6
million pounds.
The Saturn 5 Boosters have a lift off thrust of 7.5
million pounds.
The Space Shuttle can take into low earth orbit payloads of up to 40,000 pounds.
The Saturn 5 could take a 100,000 pound
load into high altitude orbit. The complete lunar lander weighed
100,000 pounds and a Saturn 5 rocket apparently took it all the way to
the moon (way beyond high altitude orbit).
This means that the Saturn 5 can carry 280,000
pounds into low earth orbit.
So, one Saturn 5 launch is equivalent to SEVEN
Space Shuttle launches. You only have to launch one Saturn 5 to carry
the same payload to low earth orbit (say, in order to build the
international space station) as SEVEN
Shuttle launches.
Which would be cheaper, researching, developing and using the Space
Shuttle, or just using the existing Saturn 5's to haul SEVEN times as much gear into
space.
Something, smells in the land of the US of A. Something, smells real
bad,....
Isn't it curious that the Russians, Europeans and the Chinese all have
cheap expendable launch vehicles with which to launch satellites, yet
the US (with all its Saturn 5 experience and technology behind it) does
not.
And, did you notice the embarrassing run of failures (the rockets blew
up) that the US had (in the 90's) when it attempted to develop its own
expendable launch vehicles (no, the US did not use the Saturn 5 (or
even some derivative vehicle) for some unexplained reason) in order to
compete with the Chinese, French and Russians in satellite launching
business.
A quote:
The shuttle is really the most complicated vehicle ever to
orbit the Earth and it is the most expensive. The number of missions,
originally predicted to be more than fifty a year, quickly fell to
about eight while the operational and development costs rose as quickly
as the vehicle leaving the launch pad. These
costs are often even more expensive than the expendable launch vehicles
(ELVs) that the space shuttle was supposed to supplant as the main road
to space.
HOME
Nerdcities/Guardian - articles and videos - 911review
Khashoggi, Part 35: Fear and Loathing at the NSA
Khashoggi, Part 36: Who Mentored Michael Hayden?
. Dan Goldin, NASA's Creature from the Black Vault, Part One
. Dan Goldin, NASA's Creature from the Black Vault, Part Two Orwell in Space
Dr. Kaminski DEFENSE MAPPING - General Dynamics, DynCorp
Michael Hayden 9/11 connection NSA
The 9/11 Evidence that May Hang George Bush
National Institute for Public Policy
Mantech, BAE, CACI, NSA SAIC etc... - 9/11Review
Astronaut Brady Suicide
Northwest pilot alleges 9/11 cover-up - Boeing lawsuit
CLEVELAND PLAIN DEALER 9/12 Delta 1989
Cleveland airport Plane made emergency landing September 11 2001
Michael Hayden 9/11 connection NSA
TV Fakery - Randy Hill, ICT, DARPA, AI, 9/11 videos
Guardian
DOD contracts prior to september 11th 2001
guardian
video archives 9/11 review
guardian WTC7 9/11 review
information
on all 4
Flights 9-11 Review
September
11
Physics
OKC Bombing
http://911review.org/Wget/members.fortunecity.com/911/
Video Evidence of Explosives In The Twin Tower Collapses 9-11
Chapter 5 - WTC Seven - The WTC Report.
World Trade Center attack
Arab-Israeli Wars.
EXPLOSION AT THE PENTAGON.
stranger-than-fiction 911review
'Project Achilles' cell phone experiment on aircraft 911review
MANY 9-11 "HIJACKERS" ARE STILL ALIVE
guardian video archives 911review
guardian WTC7 9/11 review
guardian WTC7 9/11 review
LIST OF ARTICLES.
The United States Government Committed the September 11 Attacks
Weapons of American Terrorism: Domestic Oppression
Satanic American/British Babykillers: State Terrorism of the Iraqi People