|
Caspian Oil Pipeline |
| 9/11 Encyclopedia | FrontPage | TitleIndex | WordIndex | SiteNavigation | Search |
From 9/11 Encyclopedia:
The caspian oil pipeline was one of the most important reasons to start a war against the Taliban, which was planned since 1997/98. In November 2001, parts of the pipeline had been opened in Russia: "..A new pipeline which will pump around 600,000 barrels of oil to the west from Central Asia each day will be officially opened on Tuesday.
The $2.6 billion Caspian Pipeline Consortium (CPC) project runs from the Tengiz oilfield in western Kazakhstan to Russia. U.S. companies have invested around $700 million in the pipeline, and U.S. Energy Secretary Spencer Abraham has travelled to Russia for the official opening in the southern region of Novorossiisk.
The CPC was established in 1992 by Russia, the Republic of Kazakhstan and the Sultanate of Oman to run a 1,580 kilometre crude oil pipeline to a Black Sea terminal near Novorossiisk. Construction began in 1999 and full completion is expected early next year.
The project promises estimates of around $20 billion in tax revenues for Russia and $8.2 billion for Kazakhstan. David O'Reilly, chairman and CEO of Chevron/Texaco, which has a 15 percent interest in the project, said it was "world class." He told CNN: "The first capacity of this pipeline is about 600,000 barrels a day..."New
Caspian oil interests fuel US war drive against Iraq
16 November 1998
Iraq's decision to allow the resumption of UN weapons inspections has
temporarily forestalled a US attack. But the crisis is by no means
resolved.
The
Great Game - The War For Caspian Oil And Gas
By Christopher Bollyn
10-14-1
President Bush's "crusade against the Taliban of Afghanistan has more
to do with control of the immense oil and gas resources of the Caspian
Basin than it does with "rooting out terrorism.
Afghanistan lies squarely between Turkmenistan, home to the
world's third-largest natural gas reserves, and the lucrative markets
of the Indian subcontinent, China and Japan. A memorandum of
understanding has been signed to build a 900-mile natural gas pipeline
from Turkmenistan to Pakistan via Afghanistan, but the ongoing civil
war and absence of a stable government in Afghanistan have prevented
the project from going forward.
Afghanistan was at the center of the so-called "Great Game in the 19th
century when Imperial Russia and the British Empire in India vied for
influence. Today, its geographical position as a potential transit
route for oil and natural gas pipelines, makes Afghanistan an extremely
important piece of a global strategy by energy magnates to obtain
control over these precious resources.
Enron, a Texas-based gas and energy company, together with Amoco,
British Petroleum, Chevron, Exxon, Mobil and Unocal are all engaged in
a multi-billion dollar frenzy to extract the reserves of Azerbaijan,
Kazakhstan, and Turkmenistan, the three newly independent Soviet
republics that border on the Caspian Sea.
On behalf of the oil companies, an array of former cabinet members from
the elder Bush administration have been actively involved in
negotiations with the former Soviet republics. The dealmakers include
James Baker, Brent Scowcroft, Dick Cheney, and John Sununu.
Turkmenistan and Azerbijan are also both closely allied with Israeli
commercial interests and Israeli military intelligence. In
Turkmenistan, a "former Israeli intelligence agent, Yosef A. Maiman,
president of Merhav Group of Israel, is the official negotiator and
policy maker responsible for developing the energy resources of
Turkmenistan.
"This is the Great Game all over, Maiman told The Wall Street Journal
about his role in furthering the "geopolitical goals of both the U.S.
and Israel in Central Asia. "We are doing what U.S. and Israeli policy
could not achieve, he said, "Controlling the transport route is
controlling the product.
"Those that control the oil routes out of Central Asia will impact all
future direction and quantities of flow and the distribution of
revenues from new production, said energy expert James Dorian recently
in Oil & Gas Journal on September 10.
Foreign business in Turkmenistan is dominated by Maiman's Merhav Group,
according to The Washington Report on Middle East Affairs (WRMEA).
Maiman, who was made a citizen of Turkmenistan by presidential decree,
serves as Turkmenistan's "official negotiator for its gas pipeline,
special ambassador, and "right-hand man for the "authoritarian
President Saparmurad Atayevich Niyazov, a former Politburo member of
the Central Committee of the Communist Party of the Soviet Union.
The Merhav Group of Israel officially represents the Turkmen government
and has brokered all of the energy projects in Turkmenistan, contracts
worth many billions of dollars.
Merhav has been contracted to modernize existing natural gas
infrastructure and will build new facilities in an oil refinery in the
city of Turkmenbashi on the Caspian Sea. Merhav refuses to disclose its
sources of financing.
In keeping with Israeli political interests, Maiman's planned pipelines
bypass Iran and Russia. Maiman has said that he would have no objection
to dealing with Iran, "when and if Israeli policy allows it.
Iran has accused the U.S. of trying to keep regional pipelines from
passing through Iran. Creating a counterbalance to Iran's regional
influence was a cornerstone of the Clinton administration, which was
concerned that Iran could gain too much control over Caspian exports.
"This is a common interest for the U.S. and Israel, said Dr. Nimrod
Novik, vice president of Merhav, "The primary interest is to prevent
the development of Turkish strategic dependence on Iran, given the
unique emerging strategic relationship between Turkey and Israel.
Russia and Turkmenistan are in a battle to conquer the Turkish gas
market, the supplier that offers the best price for its gas will emerge
as the winner. "This is a great race, Maiman says, "Whoever takes
Turkey first wins. Whoever comes second will have lean years.
Although the U.S. needs Russian assistance in its campaign against
Afghanistan, when AFP asked Alex Chorine of Caspian Investor what kind
of relationship existed between the Russian and Western/Israeli energy
companies doing business in the Caspian Basin, Chorine said, "They act
as enemies.
One of Maiman's proposed pipelines would bring Turkmenistan's gas and
oil to Turkey via Azerbaijan and Georgia. Maiman's Merhav Group is also
involved in a $100 million project that would reduce the flow of water
to Iraq by diverting water from the Tigris and Euphrates rivers to
southeastern Turkey.
Israeli officials boast of having "excellent relations with Azerbaijan,
where an Israeli company, Magal Security Systems, has a contract to
provide security at Baku airport. Magal is one of several Israeli
companies that will "turn Israel into a major player in Azerbaijan by
providing security for the 1,200 mile pipeline taking oil from the
Caspian to the Turkish port of Ceyhan on the Mediterranean Sea.
Enron, the biggest contributor to the Bush campaign of 2000, conducted
the feasibility study for a $2.5 billion Trans-Caspian gas pipeline,
which is being built under a joint venture agreement signed in February
1999 between Turkmenistan and two American companies, Bechtel and
General Electric Capital Services. Maiman acted as the intermediary
between the Turkmenis and the U.S. firms, but won,t discuss "his cut or
whether he will receive a stake in the pipeline.
The Merhav Group has hired a Washington lobbying firm, Cassidy
& Associates, and spent several million dollars to "encourage
U.S. officials to push for the Trans-Caspian pipeline. During the
Clinton administration, Secretary of Energy Bill Richardson and
"special adviser to the president, Richard Morningstar promoted the
Baku-Ceyhan pipeline, calling it "critical to the economic survival of
Turkmenistan.
The relationship between Israel, Turkey, and the U.S. is the major
factor for the selection of the Baku-Ceyhan route, which could be
extended to bring oil directly to energy deficient Israel, however,
energy experts question the wisdom and cost of this route. Companies
are under pressure from the U.S. and Israel to invest in east-west
pipelines, although most companies would prefer cheaper north-south
pipelines through Iran, according to WRMEA.
The U.S. firm Unocal was leading a pipeline project to bring
Turkmenistan's abundant natural gas through Afghanistan to the growing
markets of Pakistan and India, until the turmoil in Afghanistan led
them to withdraw from the project in 1998. The planned pipeline would
carry gas from the Turkmen Dauletabad fields, among the world's
largest, to Multan in Pakistan, with a planned extension to India. The
line from Dauletabad through Afghanistan is planned to transport 15
billion cubic feet of gas per year for 30 years. This pipeline is on
hold until the political and military situations in Afghanistan improve.
There is a second Unocal project to build a 1,030 mile oil pipeline
called the Central Asian Oil Pipeline Project, which would start at
Chardzhou in Turkmenistan linking Russia's Siberian oil field pipelines
to Pakistan's Arabian coast. This line could transport 1 million
barrels a day of oil from other areas of the Former Soviet Union. It
would run parallel to the gas line route through Afghanistan and branch
off in Pakistan to the Indian Ocean terminal in Ras Malan.
ISRAEL's SOVIET DICTATORS IN CENTRAL ASIA
Niyazov, the authoritarian president of the Turkmen Soviet Socialist
Republic was elected in 1990, and remained in power when Turkmenistan
declared independence in October 1991. In May 1992, Niyazov oversaw the
passage of a new constitution giving the president extraordinary powers.
Under the new constitution, the president is head of government as well
as head of state, and can appoint a prime minister at any time. The
president can also appoint and remove all judges.
Niyazov's leadership became increasingly authoritarian during the
1990s. In September 1993 he defended his policy of tight censorship of
the press as a prerequisite for stability and peace in the country. In
a referendum held in January 1994, nearly 100 percent of the voters
endorsed Niyazov's leadership, allowing him to extend his presidency
until 2002.
Niyazov renamed himself Turkmenbashi (father of the Turkmen) and
presents himself as a prophet and messiah. Every morning, state radio
and television (no independent broadcasters exist) transmit the words
of a prayer that includes an oath of allegiance to the president along
with the traditional appeal to Allah.
Like Turkmenistan, the other Central Asian nations of Uzbekistan,
Kazakstan, Kyrgyzstan, and Tajikistan are all ruled by former
Communists who came to power under the Soviet system. All five have
been re-elected to their posts without opposition, garnering over 90
percent of the votes and securing comfortable lives in the national
palaces.
In each of the Central Asian countries a strange and officially imposed
dichotomy between "official" and "unofficial" Islam has appeared.
Official Islam refers to religious institutions under the control of
the state authorities. Unofficial Islam includes all other Muslims,
especially those who believe that Islam cannot be controlled by the
state power. They are accused of being extremists.
The strength of Islamic fundamentalist movements like the Taliban in
Afghanistan and the anti-Russian Chechen rebels threatens the Soviet
style dictatorships and their control of the region's immense mineral
wealth.
FOCUS ON AFGHANISTAN
Before the sun had set on the apocalyptic day that New York's gleaming
twin towers collapsed, the U.S. government had already determined to
affix the blame for the kamikaze attacks on the World Trade Center and
the Pentagon on Osama bin Laden, the Saudi-born guerilla leader, and
the Taliban government of Afghanistan which harbored him.
Although the U.S. government did not present its evidence in support of
its case against bin Laden, Secretary of State Colin Powell said on
September 23, "I think in the near future, we will be able to put out a
paper, a document, that will describe quite clearly the evidence that
we have linking him to this attack.
When it was reported that the Taliban might turn bin Laden over to face
justice, the Bush administration said that surrendering bin Laden would
not prevent an American-led attack on Afghanistan.
An international plan to remove the fundamentalist Islamic Taliban from
power has been a subject of international diplomatic discussions for
months and was reportedly raised by India during the Group of Eight
summit in July in Genoa, Italy.
The Indian press reported in June that, "India and Iran will
facilitate, U.S. and Russian plans for limited military action, against
the Taliban if the contemplated tough new economic sanctions don,t bend
Afghanistan's fundamentalist regime.
The invasion plans described in the Indian press in June may come to
pass in October: "Tajikistan and Uzbekistan will lead the ground attack
with a strong military back up of the U.S. and Russia. Vital Taliban
installations and military assets will be targeted.
The economic reasons for the multi-national assault against the Taliban
were explained: "Uzbekistan, Tajikistan, Kazakhstan, and Turkmenistan
are threatened by the Taliban that is aiming to control their vast oil,
gas, and other resources by bringing Islamic fundamentalists into power.
What was not explained in the Indian press is how these four
predominantly Islamic Central Asian nations would be "threatened by
having "Islamic fundamentalists in power.
Halliburton - 9/11 Encyclopedia
Scowcroft, Brent - 9/11 EncyclopediaPrior Knowledge No Oil War - 9/11 conspiracy
Computer Simlation Warfare September 2001 Wargames