You may have to hit "replay video"
Please allow several seconds for the video to load.
It doesnt do much in the first part of the film
Below: This is the full video version of the 5 frames that were released in 2002
Remarkable, is the flash which happens well after the first explosion
-
Frame as shown on FOX before the "plane"
hit.
Looking closaely at this, there is a police car that goes through the damaged area
AFTER the explosion.
Here are some snapshots...Police car drive by
Before nose of aircraft appears
Nose of supposed aircraft... Above Right: Photo of the nose of N644AA (flight 77) taken on Oct 2000
NOTE: seems to be pointing down?
Also, looking closely, it almost appears that there are 2 objects, or a double nose
?
This does not seem to be a video anomaly.
Here is the portion containing the difference between the before and after
shots... I couldnt smooth the edges with the software, but you get the general idea.
What I REALLY dont understand, is the upper portion of this ?
Also this coloring has nothing to do with a silver red and blue American Airlines
livery.
I seriously doubt this is an American Airlines 757.
Frame after plane hits
Frame of tail from first video aired 2002
One OBVIOUS mistake they made with Photoshop, was,
the "line" that was added when the tail passed over the grassy lawn.
Above, we see BEFORE the explosion.
Below, AFTER the explosion, there is a solid black line over the lawn area.
This line first appears with the "vapor trail" of supposed plane.
Well, I like being thurough, so I wanted to make sure this was not a shadow from the smoke rising
Seems not. Above is taken a split second after initial explosion...
Download hi-res JPG BEFORE explosion
Download hi-res JPG AFTER explosion
Since there are a few photos
and videos
that we have identified as fakes regarding the WTC,
I would not be surprised if this has been altered.
We KNOW, the audio from the first plane (flight 11) was altered.
So I cant put much faith in this.
We Also KNOW THIS PHOTO
has been altered.
This is a Government exhibit from the Moussaoui Trial.
The time stamp on the date is 11-10-01
That would be November 11th 2001
Of course the attacks happened on September 11th.
So, could the camera have had the wrong date ?
Easy explanation right ???
NO !
The photo clearly shows MON (Monday)
November the 10th 2001 did NOT fall on a Monday.
The way the electronics in the camera works, the day of the week should have changed with the date.
I have been working in electronics my whole life.
This isnt a mis-date from the camera.
WHY would someone alter the date ?
Well....
If they wanted to try to make the case that Mohamed Atta was in a
certian place at a certian time....
Well, the explanation is too long to go into here,
Lets just say, the day this photo was supposedly taken, Mohamed Atta was in 2 places at one time !
Very distubing article showing that there were multiple identities of Mohamed
Atta. We KNOW that many of the hijackers
shown on TV September 11th and after are still
alive
Interestingly as well.
FOX's broadcast showed MORE than the 5 frames that were released previously.
This is from the first video released in 2001,
BUT, these frames have NOT been seen before by the general public.
Why were SOME of these released, but not ALL ?
What difference would SOME frames make in the Moussaoui Trial ?
UNLESS,Moussaoui's lawyers could make a case that it was NOT flight
77 ?
