Government Insider
Says Bush
Authorized 911 Attacks
Thomas Buyea,
September 17, 2004
Keep in mind when reading this, that the man being
interviewed is no two-bit internet conspiracy buff.
Stanley
Hilton was a senior advisor to Sen Bob Dole (R) and has personally
known Rumsfeld and Wolfowitz for decades. This courageous man has
risked his professional reputation, and possibly his life, to get this
information out to people.
The following is from his latest visit to Alex Jones' radio show.
Forwarded
with Compliments of Free Voice of America (FVOA): Accurate News and
Interesting Commentary for Amerika's Huddled Masses Yearning to Breathe
Free.
Note: All honor to Stanley Hilton for risking his life so that we may
know the truth of 9/11.
The Bush Junta Unmasked
"This
(9/11) was all planned. This was a government-ordered operation. Bush
personally signed the order. He personally authorized the attacks. He
is guilty of treason and mass murder." --Stanley Hilton
Alex Jones interview of Stanley Hilton, attorney for 911 taxpayers'
lawsuit:
Alex Jones Radio Show September 10, 2004 Transcription by 'RatCat'
AJ:
He is back with us. He is former Bob Dole's chief of staff, very
successful counselor, lawyer. He represents hundreds of the victims
families of 9/11. He is suing Bush for involvement in 9/11. Now a major
Zogby poll out - half of New Yorkers think the government was involved
in 9/11. And joining us for the next 35 minutes, into the next hour, is
Stanley Hilton. Stanley, it's great to have you on with us.
SH: Glad to be on.
AJ:
We'll have to recap this when we start the next hour, but just in a
nutshell, you have a lawsuit going, you've deposed a lot of military
officers. You know the truth of 9/11. Just in a nutshell, what is your
case alleging?
SH: Our case is alleging that Bush and his
puppets Rice and Cheney and Mueller and Rumsfeld and so forth, Tenet,
were all involved not only in aiding and abetting and allowing 9/11 to
happen but in actually ordering it to happen. Bush personally ordered
it to happen. We have some very incriminating documents as well as
eye-witnesses, that Bush personally ordered this event to happen in
order to gain political advantage, to pursue a bogus political agenda
on behalf of the neocons and their deluded thinking in the Middle East.
I also wanted to point out that, just quickly, I went to school with
some of these neocons. At the University of Chicago, in the late 60s
with Wolfowitz and Feith and several of the others and so I know these
people personally. And we used to talk about this stuff all of the
time. And I did my senior thesis on this very subject - how to turn the
U.S. into a presidential dictatorship by manufacturing a bogus Pearl
Harbor event. So, technically this has been in the planning at least 35
years.
AJ: That's right. They were all Straussian followers
of a Nazi-like professor. And now they are setting it up here in
America. Stanley, I know you deposed a lot of people and you've got
your $7 million dollar lawsuit with hundreds of the victim's families
involved.
SH: 7 billion, 7 billion
AJ: Yeah, 7 billion. Can you go over some of the new and incriminating
evidence you've got of them ordering the attack?
SH:
Yes, let me just say that this is a taxpayers' class action lawsuit as
well as a suit on behalf of the families and the basic three arguments
are they violated the Constitution by ordering this event. And secondly
that they [garbled] fraudulent Federal Claims Act, Title 31 of the U.S.
Code in which Bush presented false and fraudulent evidence to Congress
to get the Iraq war authorization. And, of course, he related it to
9/11 and claimed that Saddam was involved with that, and all these lies.
AJ: Tell you what, stay there. Stanley, we've got to break. Let's come
back and get into the evidence.
BREAK
AJ:
All right my friends, second hour, September 10th, 2004, the
anniversary of the globalist attack coming up tomorrow. It's an amazing
individual we have on the line. Bob Dole's former chief of staff,
political scientist, a lawyer, he went to school with Rumsfeld and
others, he wrote his thesis about how to turn America into a
dictatorship using a fake Pearl Harbor attack. He's suing the U.S.
government for carrying out 9/11. He has hundreds of the victims'
families signing onto it - it's a $7 billion lawsuit. And he is Stanley
Hilton. I know that a lot of stations just joined us in Los Angeles and
Rhode Island and Missouri and Florida and all over. Please sir, recap
what you were just stating and then let's get into the new evidence.
And then we'll get into why you are being harassed by the FBI, as other
FBI people are being harassed who have been blowing the whistle on
this. So, this is really getting serious. Stanley, tell us all about it.
SH:
Yeah, we are suing Bush, Condoleezza Rice, Cheney, Rumsfeld, Mueller,
etc. for complicity in personally not only allowing 9/11 to happen but
in ordering it. The hijackers we retained and we had a witness who is
married to one of them. The hijackers were U.S. undercover agents. They
were double agents, paid by the FBI and the CIA to spy on Arab groups
in this country. They were controlled. Their landlord was an FBI
informant in San Diego and other places. And this was a direct, covert
operation ordered, personally ordered by George W. Bush. Personally
ordered. We have incriminating evidence, documents as well as
witnesses, to this effect. It's not just incompetence - in spite of the
fact that he is incompetent. The fact is he personally ordered this,
knew about it. He, at one point, there were rehearsals of this. The
reason why he appeared to be uninterested and nonchalant on September
11th - when those videos showed that Andrew Card whispered in his ear
the [garbled] words about this he listened to kids reading the pet goat
story, is that he thought this was another rehearsal. These people had
dress-rehearsed this many times. He had seen simulated videos of this.
In fact, he even made a Freudian slip a few months later at a
California press conference when he said he had, quote, "seen on
television the first plane attack the first tower." And that could not
be possible because there was no video. What it was was the simulated
video that he had gone over. So this was a personally
government-ordered thing. We are suing them under the Constitution for
violating Americans' rights, as well as under the federal Fraudulent
Claims Act, for presenting a fraudulent claim to Congress to justify
the bogus Iraq boondoggle war, for political gains. And also, under the
RICO statute, under the Racketeering Corrupt Organization Act, for
being a corrupt entity. And I've been harassed personally by the chief
judge of the federal court who is instructing me personally to drop
this suit, threatened to kick me off the court, after 30 years on the
court. I've been harassed by the FBI. My staff has been harassed and
threatened. My office has been broken into and this is the kind of
government we are dealing with.
AJ: Absolutely and now it
has come out - five separate drills of flying hijacked jets into
buildings that morning - which you told us about before it even broke
in the Associated Press. They were trying to get out ahead of you. You
talked about how you interviewed military people who were told it was a
drill that morning. Then to get out ahead of that, the news finally
reported on it. Now, we've learned that all these operations - I want
to get into that, I want to talk about the new incriminating evidence
of ordering it and how they had drilled on this, how Cheney was in the
bunker controlling this. That has even come out in the mainstream news
but they won't release the details of that, Stanley. But what type of
FBI harassment are you going through?
SH: First of all, my
office was burglarized in San Francisco several months ago. Files were
gone through and some files were seized - particularly the ones dealing
with the lady that was married to one of the hijackers. Fortunately, I
had spare copies in a hidden place so nothing disappeared permanently.
But more significantly, FBI agents have been harassing one of my staff
members and threatening them with vague but frightening threats of
indicting them. And it's just total harassment. They have planted a
spy, an undercover agent, in my organization, as we just recently
discovered. In other words, these are Nazi Germany tactics. This is the
kind of government you have in this country. This is what Bush is all
about.
AJ: Stay there, Stanley, Bob Dole's former chief of staff. We'll come
back after this quick break. Please stay with us.
BREAK
AJ:
All right, eight minutes, 25 seconds into the second hour. Stanley
Hilton, political scientist, lawyer, Bob Dole's former chief of staff,
is suing the government for 7 billion dollars for carrying out 9/11 and
for racketeering. And he joins us now. During the break, I first really
did the big interview with Stanley Hilton after I saw him attacked on
Fox News. And that interview got massive attention. And then he kind of
went underground for a while because a judge, we're going to talk about
that, ordered him to not do any more interviews. And now he's back
doing interviews. He's had his office broken into, FBI threats and
harassment. Bottom line, he has deposed military individuals, wives of
hijackers, you name it, it was a government operation. It has even come
out in mainstream news, a piece here, a piece there. They had drills on
9/11, that's why NORAD stood down. Cheney was in control of the whole
thing. Stanley Hilton has now gotten documents about how Bush ordered
the whole operation. And I'll tell you right now, his life is in
danger, folks. And he's got so much courage. He went to school with
these neocons at the University of Chicago. He wrote his thesis on how
the government could use terrorist attacks to set up martial law. He is
the man for the time and folks wondered why he disappeared for a while
and just did his lawsuit and wasn't doing interviews, it was because he
was ordered to. Stanley, can you get into that for us?
SH: I
did an interview with you, Alex, back in March of 2003, about a year
and a half ago, and literally two weeks after that, I was contacted by
the emissary of the chief judge of the federal court where I have the
lawsuit. And I was warned not to publicize it but to keep it quiet and
threatened with discipline. And it remained quiet until a couple of
months ago and then I got on the air on some programs and some
publicity and July 1st, I was threatened directly by the chief judge
here, threatened with court discipline. This particular judge has been
circulating communiqués to the other federal judges seeking
anything
negative she can get against me to try and discipline me after I've
been on the court here for 30 years with no disciplinary problems at
all. This is suddenly happening. And her assistants who are on the
committee of the court met with me on July 1st in Palo Alto,
California, and threatened me directly. They handed me a copy of the
lawsuit and said that the judge wants me to dismiss this. What's this?
She doesn't like the content of it. This is politically incorrect. This
is outside the norm. I said I represented more than 400 plaintiffs, how
am I going to dismiss this case? And they threatened me directly and
they said, "the next time you'll be disciplined." And also they've
threatened me not to go public, etc. And this is just outrageous.
AJ: It's all color of law. No direct orders, just all in your face.
SH:
They sent a letter out, and of course they deny it's because of the
political content of the suit but they told me directly on the phone
that it is because of this suit and this judge is very, very angry,
apparently has been in contact with Ashcroft's Justice Department. I
got a call from Ashcroft's Justice Department a few months ago about
this, demanding that I drop the suit, threatening sanctions and all
kinds of things. I refused to drop it.
AJ: Now let's go back over, you had them break into your office,
harassment. Let's go over that in detail.
SH:
My office was broken into about 6 months ago. The file cabinets - it
was obvious they had been rifled through. Files were stolen. Files
dealing with this particular case and particularly with the documents I
had regarding the fact that the - some of these hijackers, at least
some of them were on the payroll of the U.S. government as undercover
FBI, CIA, double agents. They are spying on Arab groups in the U.S.
And, in effect, all this led up to the effect that al Qaeda is a
creation of the George Bush administration, basically. That the entity
that he called al Qaeda is directly linked to George Bush. And all this
stuff was stolen. Fortunately, I had copies. But this was just part of
the harassment. The FBI has also been harassing some of my assistants
and has planted a spy in our midst. And it is just outrageous that
these Nazi tactics are being used - and the obstruction of justice,
these people are criminals. And that's what's happening under the
tremendous pressure here to just drop it. Or to shut up now and just go
away.
AJ: Now, let's talk about what they want you to drop.
Let's talk about, without giving names, the people you deposed, what
really happened, the picture you've got. You said earlier that Bush
ordered this, they were simulating this which they now admit there were
simulations on that morning. Let's go over what they don't want you to
talk about, Stanley.
SH: We have evidence both documentary
as well as witness sworn statements from undercover former FBI agents,
FBI informants, etc., that other officials in the Pentagon and the
military and the Air Force that deal with the fact that there were many
drills, many rehearsals for 9/11 before it happened. Bush had seen this
simulated on TV many times. He blurted this out at a press conference
in California a few months after 9/11 where he said he had, quote, seen
the first plane hit the first building on the video. And that's not
possible because there was no official video of that. There was one of
the second plane not the first one. He had seen the first one. We do
have some incriminating documents that Bush personally ordered 9/11
events. It was well planned. A FEMA official has admitted on tape that
he was there the night before - September 10th, that is.
AJ:
And now Mayor Giuliani, a few months ago in the 911 Commission,
admitted that - Tripod II. They had their whole command post already
moved out of Building 7. Now, this is very, very important. This is a
key area of this whole event. You said months before it came out on the
CIA's own website and the Associated Press, you said I deposed people.
They said there were drills that morning and exactly what happened,
happening - that was the smoke-screen for the stand-down. And then to
get out ahead of it, the CIA comes out and said yeah we were running a
drill that morning. Now, we've learned that five, possibly six, were
confirmed. Five of these - one drill with the exact same thing
happening that actually happened, at the exact same time in the
morning. That's why NORAD stood down with 24 different blips on the
screen. You've said this. You brought this up first. Now, I know you
can't get too much into detail but can you tell us how you learned of
this?
SH: I have interviewed individuals in NORAD and the
Air Force. I personally toured NORAD many years ago around the time
that I worked for Dole. I'm very familiar with the operations at
Cheyenne Mountain at Colorado Springs, where NORAD is. Individuals that
work in NORAD as well as the Air Force have stated this, off the
record, but the point is, yes, this was not just five drills but at
least 35 drills over at least two months before September 11th.
Everything was planned, the exact location.
AJ: But five drills that day.
SH: That day, that day, and Bush thought it was a drill.
That's the only explanation for why he appeared nonchalant.
AJ: We also had NORAD officers and civilian air traffic controllers
going, "Is this part of the exercise? Is this a drill?"
SH: Yes.
AJ: On the tapes and in TV interviews, they thought it was, quote, a
drill.
SH:
That's right. That's exactly what I said long before it became public.
I've known about this since earlier in March of '03, as I stated
before. This was all planned. This was a government-ordered operation.
Bush personally signed the order. He personally authorized the attacks.
He is guilty of treason and mass murder. And now, obstruction of
justice by attempting to use a federal judge and FBI agents to inhibit
a legitimate civil lawsuit in this country, in federal court. Even a
chief judge in this court tried to harass and threaten me personally
for representing legitimate plaintiffs. And they got Clinton for
allegedly lying under oath about Paula Jones and now - look what's
happening now. And Ken Starr used to be across from me in Duke Law
School in the early `70s and it´s interesting that he got
away with
trying to get Clinton impeached, so we have a far worse criminal
sitting in the oval office today - somebody guilty of mass murder as
well as obstruction of justice.
AJ: Well, I mean look, they
say they never heard of a plan to fly planes into buildings - said it
all over television - Rice, Bush, Cheney, Rumsfeld, Ashcroft. And then
we find out they were running all these drills that morning. Even if
they weren't involved, that proves they were liars about ever hearing
of such a plan.
SH: Well, I'm trying to take their
depositions - I've been trying to take their depositions for months.
They've been trying to object to it. They will have to admit they were
either lying then or now. It's clearly perjury either way. They are
liars and perjurers; that's what they are. These are the people that we
have running this government and, of course, they knew about it. How
are they going to claim now that they didn't know about these drills?
Their idea is that nobody knew anything. It's the old know-nothing
mentality. And how anybody considers this believable is beyond me.
AJ:
All right, now people ask how could a huge organization, how could the
AWACs, how could the military let this happen; whereas before, if your
Cessna got off course for five minutes, they would launch F-16s on you.
It's real simple. It's what Stanley Hilton said here a year and a half
ago. It's what came out in the news after that. The military, good
people, were told this was all a drill. And it was not a drill. And ABC
News admits that Cheney was in control of [?] out of the White House
[?] and that he ordered the military to quote "do something." Our
inside sources from Hilton and others say it was a stand down and they
admit they will not release that under national security. Stanley?
SH:
Well they are going to admit it, they're going to release it in the
court case because if you demand it under subpoena powers and they must
release it. And part of our lawsuit is brought in the name of the U.S.
because under the federal fraudulent [Claims Act], we accuse the Bush
Administration of presenting a fraudulent claim to Congress. And under
the statutes of Title 31 of the U.S. code, they must release this
information. That's why they are trying to threaten me, harass me,
invade my office, steal my files, commit blatant obstruction of justice
and other crimes to try and prevent a legitimate civil suit from
exposing these criminals and their acts of treason and mass murder.
AJ: I think you need to publicly tell folks that you are not planning
suicide. Would you like to tell folks that?
SH:
(laughs) I'm not planning suicide. I've got family and I'm not planning
that but I don't like the threats I'm under - but I can tell you this,
it's taking a toll emotionally on me and my staff. And particularly,
when you get a threat from the chief judge of your own court.
AJ: Why have you decided to go public again after a year of being under
the radar?
SH:
Because the more and more evidence that I've been adducing over a year
and a half has made it so obvious to me that this was now without any
doubt a government operation and that it amounts to the biggest act of
treason and mass murder in American history. I mean George Bush makes
Benedict Arnold look like a patriot. He makes Benedict Arnold look like
George Washington. I mean that's what we have - a criminal and a
traitor sitting in the White House pretending he's a patriot, wrapping
himself in the flag. And it's pretty disgusting because the other side
of the so-called opposition, the Kerry camp is just saying nothing
because they're afraid to speak.
AJ: Stay right there. We'll be right back.
BREAK
AJ:
Stanley Hilton will be with us for another 15 or 16 minutes. Then he's
got to go into court. Bob Dole's former chief of staff, political
scientist, lawyer, represents 400 plus plaintiffs - most of them
victims of 9/11. When I was in New York last week, everybody I was
talking to, I mean 90 plus percent of them at ground zero - "I had
family, I worked in the buildings, my son's a Navy Seal - he called the
night before and said don't go to work." You know, all of this, and
then now they never had any idea - and it turns out they had all these
drills - and one drill of hijacked jets flying into the World Trade
Center and Pentagon at 8:30 in the morning. That morning - come on
people! And Stanley Hilton brought all this out on this show before it
was in the mainstream news. And I was talking to him during the break.
I mean, the harassment, the moles, the threatening of his staff, the
judge threatening him. Stanley, let's get specifically into the
documents that you have now got that they have now been robbing you
for, that you luckily, thank God had copies. Specifically, Bush
ordering this. Can you get into that for us - ordering 9/11?
SH:
National Security Council classified documents which [garbled] and it's
was part of a series of documents that were involved with the drill
documents. This was all planned - they had it on videotape. These
planes were controlled by remote control, as I stated previously a year
and a half ago, there's a system called Cyclops. There is a computer
chip in the nose of the plane and it enables the ground control, the
military ground control, to disable the pilot's control of the plane
and to control it and to fly it directly into those towers. That's what
happened. It's also a technology used on what's called the Global Hawk,
which is an aircraft drone - a remote- controlled aircraft. And they
were doing it. We are talking about National Security Council
classified documents that clearly indicated that [garbled] had a green
light to order this to go and this is no drill. These drills that were
running were clearly a dress rehearsal and this was a government
operation. You wonder why these people are trying to threaten people
and trying to intimidate people who have written this suit, I guess if
you murdered 3000 of your own citizens, in conjunction with the corrupt
Royal family of Saudi Arabia as Bush did. And if you then waste
billions more on a worthless garbage war in Iraq, I guess you've got
something to worry about and you want to threaten people to prevent it
from coming out.
AJ: I mean let's look at this. Not only
are there dress rehearsals, they are smoke screens so the good military
stands down and doesn't know what's happening. But it's now coming out,
even in mainstream news, that yes these drills were going on. Yes, and
some of these drills, quote, passenger-type jets were under remote
control - this is decades old technology. In 1958, NORAD was [ ] old
jets and using them for target practice. Decades ago they flew jumbo
jets from LA to Sidney Australia. So since that's going on, everybody
knows that. And it's the same MO. Just like the first World Trade
Center [bombing] where they get two retarded men who followed this
blind sheik who had a tiny mosque above a pizza parlor. And they set
them up as the patsies. Then the FBI cooks the bomb, trains the
drivers. This informant goes, "You're not going to bomb the building?
They go "Yeah, we're letting it go forward." He tapes them to protect
themselves. The two retarded gentlemen, thank God, didn't park it up
against the column, as the FBI instructed them to do, so it didn't
bring down the tower - because you have to be right up against the
column. That doesn't happen. Yet, it's the same thing with 9/11. You've
got these CIA agents, these Arabs, who were trained at U.S. military
bases, Pensacola Naval Air Station - mainstream media, out creating
their legends for this background. They're on board the aircraft. My
military sources say nerve gas kills everybody on board the plane -
nerve gas packets. Then they fly the planes into buildings. From your
inside sources, is that accurate?
SH: It's one of the things
that we are looking into - that nerve gas or something else disabled
people. It's possible. I can't say for sure to be honest with you.
AJ: All you know is they were government agents and they were on board
and the planes were remote controlled.
SH:
Yeah, it was basically a smokescreen. I mean, the events of the
hijackings, how someone snuck in those cutters, it was a plant. It was
like a classic decoy. I've got some military background. And it's
called decoy. It's a decoy operation. You make the people focus on the
decoy to avoid looking at the real criminals. So they are focusing on
these so-called nineteen hijackers and saying, "Oh, it must have been
these Arabs. When, in fact, the guilty person is at 1600 Pennsylvania
Avenue - sitting in the oval office. That's the guilty person. That's
the one who authorized it. There is only one man who could have
authorized this operation and that's Bush. And anyone at NORAD will
tell you as I have been told personally at NORAD in the war control
room, there is only one man who has the power to do this kind of thing
and that's Bush. Even though many believe he's a puppet. And I think in
many ways he is. The fact of the matter is where was [ ] Cheney,
Rumsfeld and these other traitors. The fact is Bush personally ordered
and he's guilty and liable and he's going to be re-elected apparently
because the media's asleep and [garbled] for Bush.
AJ: Well, the media is owned by the same military industrial complex
that carried out the attacks.
SH:
Yeah, the media is only interested in maintaining the official
government fantasy that this was a little lone Arab. These Arabs
couldn't even steer that plane down a runway.
AJ: Stay there Stanley, final segment coming up.
BREAK
AJ:
Mr. Hilton, when you talk to these FBI agents, when you talk to these
military men and women, what's their attitude? They've got to be pretty
freaked out to have the big picture and know what actually happened on
9/11.
SH: Yes, you know it's like clouds just before a
thunderstorm in the sense that they are sort of pregnant with rage.
They are just enraged at the criminal politicians who have perverted
and misused the government to murder its own citizens and pursue these
dubious political ends. And many of them, in increasing numbers, are
willing to talk and will talk under subpoena - but only under subpoena
because the official party line of the government is shut up and don't
talk to the trial lawyer. But more and more, they are very outraged
that part of the government has done this to its own people, to its own
people. I mean you have to go back to Stalin to see something - not
even Hitler did this to his own people. You have to look at Stalin who
murdered the Kulaks, the Russians for his own dubious gains. Also we've
got - we have a Stalinist mentality in this country. And, if these
people pose as patriots and wrap themselves in the flag, it's
disgusting. I wanted also to point out that the Japanese television
network, Asahi, is going to be airing a special on primetime tomorrow,
on September 11th. They interviewed me for eight hours a couple of
weeks ago. I'll be on that. I wish - of course, the America media don't
care so they are not going to care. But in Japan, people are very
serious in interviewing me and others. And we have a website now,
called deprogram.info, if more people are interested:
www.deprogram.info. But the other thing, I just wanted to say that if
anything happens to me - and I don't know why - because I'm being
threatened here now. And it seems you can't bring a case in this
country anymore against criminals in power without being threatened.
And this is how they operate. The stakes are pretty high when you've
got a world historical level of treason and fraud by this government
against it's own people. I guess this is what you have to expect.
AJ:
Stanley, the globalists, the new world order crowd, definitely intend
to carry out more terror attacks. I know they would have carried out
more attacks if we wouldn't have done what we've been up to, if you
wouldn't have been out there boldly speaking out and many others. And
then their electronic Berlin wall has a bunch of cracks in it now.
Thanks to good people like yourself and many others who are speaking
out and telling the truth. But do you think that they may carry out
what they've been hyping - a suitcase nuke attack, a biological release
to try to smokescreen all of this? I know it's a catch 22, you've got
to expose the murderers. We've got to get the word out on this but some
government people that I've talk to say, "Yeah, but if you do that,
they are going to go even more hard core and must totally try to take
over." But I say regardless, they are already doing that. So what do
you say to that?
SH: Well, yeah, I think they have an
agenda. They have contingency plans. I think they are laying low now
because there are an increasing number of people, like myself, who are
openly challenging them and accusing them of criminal conduct. I think
they would have done it again if we had not spoken up. I think they're
planning, what they would like to do is silence any dissenters. That's
why we are trying to get the Patriot Act declared unconstitutional in
this lawsuit also.
AJ: Let's talk about polls. In the
beginning a patriot is a scarce man, hated and feared, but in time when
his cause succeeds, the timid join him, because then it costs nothing
to be a patriot. You are one of those guys who hit the barbwire for us,
or figuratively jumped on the hand grenade for America. But when you've
got a Zogby poll, who is highly respected, half of New Yorkers believe
that the government was involved. When you have a Canadian poll, 63% on
average believe that the U.S. government was involved. And some groups,
as high as 76% in polls believe the government was involved. European
polls, two- thirds show the same thing. We have German defense
ministers and technology ministers and another member of their
government now, three of them going public, known conservatives, and
progressives. You have an environment minister, Michael Meacher, saying
that if they didn't do it, they sure as hell knew what was going on.
Look, if anybody who is a thinking person looks at the evidence, their
official story is impossible. Then you investigate and they are
involved in it. Comments to this massive awakening and what's happening.
SH:
Well, I think that's why they want the Patriot Act to suppress
political dissent. They have to, they're anticipating, they are not
dumb individuals. I know these people personally, Wolfowitz. These are
criminal individuals but they are smart and so they anticipated
political dissent. And that's why, like the Nazis, their forebears, and
their blood brothers, the Nazis and the Stalinists, they're all for
political repression. Every corrupt and criminal government has done
this - they suppress their own people: Nazi Germany, Communist Russia,
Mao Tse-Tung, that's why we have the Patriot Act. So it's hand in hand.
They had it planned to go right up to September 11th, this was all part
of the plan. You have to do it. It was part of my senior thesis. You
must follow through the terrorists attacks with a political suppression
mechanism in the law. And that's why they want Patriot I and Patriot II
and their plans are to continue launching more terrorist attacks to
justify even more repression. The goal is to make this a one party
dictatorship in this country, to pursue their dubious ends with their
blood brothers like the Saudi Royal family. And also, historical blood
brothers, such as the Nazi Germany and the Communist Russian. That's
the goal.
AJ: You've got to go in just a minute or two. But
I wanted to also tell you about New York. Sound cannons that are used
in Iraq, they're against us. Men in black ski masks. 41,000 police,
accredited media being arrested randomly. Children being arrested,
people in wheelchairs, 2000 plus people put in a camp with barbwire
fences inside with no bathrooms. You had to have permission to go to
the porta-potties. Police screaming at you. It had nothing to do with
terrorism. They are openly setting the precedent for martial law.
SH:
Well, that's right, the word terrorist is now being overly broad and
overly defined [garbled] and also, you know, it's like the word
communist was used for anything during the McCarthy witch hunt. And
anybody can be called a terrorist by Bush's definition. But the irony
is that the number one terrorist in the world is living at the White
House at the oval office today. That's the real irony. For sheer
hypocrisy, I think he deserves the world prize and ought to be in the
Ripley book, Believe It or Not, and the Guinness book of world records
for sheer brazen chicanery and fraud.
AJ: Let me ask you a
question on this because this is the experience that I had. Watching
television, watching the killers, watching those that are guilty, stand
up there as our saviors is incredibly painful. It's like watching Ted
Bundy being the judge at his own trial. I mean it is just painful to
know who these people are. To see them putting America in a shredder.
Now we are going to have forced psychological testing of every
American, forced drugging, you know Pan-American unions, I mean it's
just all happening, it's in our face, Stanley.
SH: Yeah,
it's very disturbing and as one who has studied the theory and concept
of dictatorships, I personally interviewed Albert Speer, who was
Hitler's armaments minister. I interviewed him in 1981 in Munich. And
I've studied the psychology and history of totalitarianism and there is
no question that it's very frightening. And it has, today, with high
technology, albeit for the first time in history, the chance of having
a world empire dominated by corrupt, technologically oriented
government - an elite government. And they've got now what people like
Napoleon and Hitler didn't have, which is the technological means to
dominate not only their own country but others - the world.
AJ:
The answer is to expose them as the terrorists, to show how PNAC
[Project for the New American Century] said we need helpful Pearl
Harbor events, to show how Northwoods called for the exact 9/11-style
attacks, to show their own plans. And to force people to face this
horror. What are they going to do in a year or two when 80% of us, not
half of us, know the truth?
SH: Well, that's why they want
repression and, then again, the ancient old diversion, launch another
terrorist attack to get people to pitch it away. I mean who knows what
they'll do next. I mean their capacity for ingenious creation of these
events is sort of unraveled. I mean there is no limit. My guess is they
are going to try another stunt - maybe a stunt just before the election
to justify getting Bush reelected. Although it seems like he is running
against a straw man or a ghost right now, anyway. But, my guess is
they'll try some other tactic to get people's attention away from 9/11
if it gets to be too much attention. What you really want is for the
public to just lose interest because the public - and it's like
remember the Alamo, you know, people don't forget things like that. To
me it's like the Alamo, remember 9/11, that ought to be the slogan for
this outrageous act of treason. That's what it is. It's not...
AJ: We are at a crossroads, I don't think they anticipated this much
resistance, Stanley.
SH:
Yeah, I hope they are truly wrong and as incompetent as they are
corrupt and guilty. That means their incompetence is exceeded only by
their corruption and their guilt. And eventually, if enough people are
going to get outraged enough, these people in the bureaucracy and in
the civil service and our military, and eventually we can get people
under subpoena these individuals will be exposed.
AJ:
Stanley, their whole operation hinges on us being naïve and
not
recognizing evil. This is what they got with Hitler and others. People
couldn't recognize evil so they continued to repeat succumbing to it.
We are recognizing it this time. We are putting our lives, our
treasure, our future on the line for freedom because we cannot let
these blood-thirsty control freak terrorists capture us and use us and
turn us into the empire and have a draft and use us as their slaves to
invade the planet. And that's their PNAC plan. Stanley Hilton, I know
you've got to get to court. God bless you. I want to thank you for
being here with us today. Can we get you back on next week?
SH: Sure, just give me a call.
AJ: God bless you my friend. Any closing comments?
SH:
My closing comments would be, I think people ought to just think about
the consequence of having someone like Bush in the White House and the
danger for the future that these sorts of individuals pose. This is not
just a historical event of the past. This is part of the plan and the
camera is still rolling. They have an agenda. These individuals are
extremely dangerous. They are armed and dangerous. They pose a clear
and dangerous threat to every freedom-loving person not only American
but in the whole world.
AJ: You are absolutely right
Stanley Hilton. They have captured the government. They have not
captured the peoples' minds and they are counting on us not facing up
to it.
SH: And they are counting on the repressive Patriot
Act and threats and chief judges and FBI agents threatening people who
are exposing them. That's what they are counting on.
AJ: But you're not backing down are you, my friend.
SH: No, I'm not.
AJ: Well, we all stand with you, my brother, and God bless you.
SH: All right. Thank you.
|
