Alex
Constantine
Smoking Gun
The 9/11 Evidence that May Hang George W. Bush
http://www.nofadz.com/~serendip/wot/seal01.htm
http://www.scoop.co.nz/stories/HL0206/S00071.htm
http://www.apfn.org/apfn/WTC_smoking-gun.htm
http://bushmerika2.blogspot.com/2006/09/bullhorns-and-nationalism-five-years.html
© 2002 the News Insider and Cheryl Seal
The Case Against G.W. Bush: a Preliminary "Hearing" in the
Court of Common Sense
At the very least Bush allowed 9/11 to happen. But the evidence
indicates his guilt involves more than just a huge intentional sin
of omission — this now seems certain. So it is
ulcer-fomenting to
watch him, Cheney, Condoleeza Rice and their PR army try to sell
America yet another Big Lie — that they had no idea such a
thing as
9/11 could happen ... they could never have imagined it in their
wildest dreams ... they had no specific warnings ... there was
nothing unusual about the summer 2001 warnings, etc, etc, ad
nauseam. I have compiled some material that clearly shows that the
above litany is blatantly, arrogantly false. But first, let's hold
a preliminary hearing in the "Court of Common sense".
To see through a wall of propaganda and determine what's really
going on, one must tune out the spin completely and take a good,
objective look at what has been DONE and what the parties involved
have to GAIN by their actions. Let's look at the well-documented
facts:
First, when Bush, Rice and the other top Reichmeisters discarded
the warning on August 6, Bush's approval ratings had sunk to just
49% — this is the red zone for a president. Ask any political
expert or presidential historian: Hit 45% and impeachment may soon
loom on the horizon.
Second, Bush's actions throughout his entire life show a clear and
consistent pattern: without exception, he has always chosen the
path that will benefit himself and his corporate friends the most
and will do so in the face of even the most outraged criticism.
Third, the stolen election of 2000 proves that Bush was willing to
participate in a very daring, very large scale crime in pursuit of
power.
Fourth, Bush's father's approval ratings went from shaky to
astronomical within a month of declaring war on an "evil terrorist"
leader back in 1991. This lesson could hardly have been lost on
Bush, Jr.: Start a war and the emotions of the public can be
whipped up to a point that will push presidential approval ratings
way, way up.
So, given the above facts as "evidence," what do you imagine a
self-serving man who has faced no serious opposition from Congress,
the press, or the American public would be likely to do? A bookie
would most certainly lay odds that Bush would stand aside and allow
an event like 9/11 to happen.
Another action that must be considered in the cold hard light of
day is Bush's behavior after 9/11. He seized upon national fears,
worked at intensifying them, and immediately, without waiting for
Congress or serious discussions with other nations, called for an
attack on Afghanistan and a global war on terrorism. At the same
time, he worked through John Ashcroft with stunning swiftness to
dismantle civil liberties. These are not the actions of a leader
who wants to keep his nation calm, reassured, and standing tall in
its principles in the wake of tragedy. They are the actions of an
opportunist who knows, from watching his father's presidency, that
the window of opportunity for consolidating his power will be
narrow: Bush Sr.'s approval rating high lasted only a few
months.
Last, why would Bush admit to having been warned about 9/11 in the
first place? In the corporate and political world, this admission
is a strategy that has been used over and over by creeps who are
guilty of huge crimes and know the heat is on. By confessing to a
lesser charge, they try to draw the heat away from the main, more
dangerous issue. Ken Lay, the head of Anderson, and every criminal
who has ever copped or tried to cop a plea bargain have used this
ploy. If Bush were innocent of any complicity in 9/11, why should
he make ANY statement? It is always the guilty who feel the need to
make statements: "I am not a crook!", "I never had sex with that
woman!" Or how about that row of tobacco industry CEO's who all
swore that none of them knew their product was harmful or
addictive?
Therefore, based on the evidence, I would say we have a phony
president who is as guilty as hell, who knows that someone has the
goods on him and is breathing down his neck. He is gambling that by
making a preemptive strike while he still has control of the media,
he can spin a protective wall around himself. Thus we have Dick
Cheney appearing on 5/19 on Meet the Press, being "interviewed"
about the 9/11 flap by his friend and neighbor Russert. Yep, that's
right — both interviewer and interviewee live in the feudally
exclusive Kalorama suburb of D.C., where houses START at around $1
million. In fact, on the same program, Russert had the arrogance to
even mention how he'd seen his buddy out taking the air on his new
"It" scooter. How cozy! And this is what is being served to America
in the name of a free and honest press. Ya got a problem? Just pick
a pal in the press corps and tell him what questions you want
him/her to ask you so you can spin them in just the way you
want.
Russert asked Cheney how he responded to charges that the
information existed in several reports which showed that a WTC-type
attack was a possibility. Cheney responded — incredibly!
— that
reading all those reports weren't his concern. There's just too
darn many of them. Russert let this ridiculous response go totally
unchallenged and unqualified.
Here are the questions that are missing — the questions a
real
journalist would have asked: "So then, Mr. Cheney, just what are
your criteria for a report that is important enough for you to
read? How do you prioritize what you read or what those under you
are directed to call to your attention? What reports on this matter
DID you read?"
It is insulting to America's intelligence that such questions are
not being asked. It's like a grand jury that refuses to ask a
murder suspect questions like "Where were you on the night of such
and such? What was your relationship to the victim?" but instead
says, "Well, here's what we heard from the police that someone
thinks you may have killed someone. Go ahead and explain yourself.
Don't worry — we won't interrupt you or ask you any
uncomfortable
questions. And, by the way, your good pal who lives down the block
volunteered to serve as jury foreman!"
Here's one last FACT to consider. The GOP spent $40 million to
pursue an ultimately merit-less case against Clinton that involved
diddling an intern and some questionable real estate deals. Since
Bush took office, not one dime has been spent by Congress to
investigate Cheney and his secret energy dealings, Bush's stolen
election, Tom Delay's boiler room scams that have bilked doctors
out of millions, the mysterious wild trading of American and United
Airlines stock the week before 9/11 or any of the other crimes that
were far more serious than Clinton's offenses. Meanwhile, the GOP
—
so eager to spend millions to investigate an office romance —
has
worked overtime to block the initiation of any serious
investigation into the biggest crime to have ever been perpetrated
on American soil that claimed nearly 3,000 lives. WAKE UP
AMERICA!!
"Vague Warning" or Blueprint for Disaster?
The story Bush wants the world to buy is that the warnings he
received were vague, routine, too general to act upon. Condi Rice
wants us to believe that no one in the administration could have
dreamed the hijackers would fly into a landmark building. But, as
they say in show biz, this is "lies, lies, and damn lies."
Since 1993, scores of people, collectively, in the White House,
Pentagon, State Department, FBI, and CIA have know that an attack
like 9/11 was not only a possibility — but an increasingly
likely
probability. Because I am not writing a book here, I will confine
myself to summarizing the most obvious pieces of evidence that Bush
and his team had to work with. However, they are enough to convict
him in any court of opinion.
Terrorism 2000 Report
Don't confuse this 1993 study with the report turned out by the
Bush administration in April 2001 under the same title. The 2001
release, a summary of terrorist activity in 2000, lifted the title
of the original document, no doubt as a smokescreen to confuse
anyone who might be seeking the 1993 document through a search
engine or library archives.
In 1993, the Pentagon commissioned, via the Department of Defense's
office of Special Operations and Low-Intensity Conflict, a think
tank-style study of the ways terrorists could execute large-scale
acts of terrorism on the US. Participants in the $150,000 study
consisted of a panel of 41 intelligence/security experts that
included former ranking CIA, FBI, State Department and Rand
Corporation officials, as well as an ex-KGB general and Israeli
intelligence agent.
One of the problems the team brainstormed over was the various ways
an airplane could be used to destroy national landmarks — in
fact,
the WTC was most certainly on the panel's list of possible targets.
One conclusion reached by the team as a future trend in terrorist
activity was that extremists would seek to maximize their impact by
escalating their attacks from one-at-a-time truck bomb/suicide
bomber events to multiple, simultaneous targeting, thereby touting
their power and stretching the victim governments' ability to
respond.
The possible terrorist scenarios the team outlined scared the socks
off folks in the government. One high-level official described it
as "too outrageous." As a result, the team's report, Terrorism 2000
(a reference to terrorism in the new millennium) was blocked from
public release. Even a toned down version that had been proposed as
a way to raise public awareness and improve national preparedness
was killed! A draft of the report was nonetheless passed on through
the Pentagon, the Justice Department and the Federal Emergency
Management Agency. There is absolutely no doubt that this
information was available to everyone in the Bush Administration,
including Ms. Rice. It should have been required reading —
especially since many of the predictions made by the report had
already come true before 9/11.
Four instances of planes used as weapons before 2001
1994: A Federal Express Flight engineer was apprehended as he tried
to storm the cockpit of a DC-10. The engineer, despondent over his
impending firing, had planned to crash the plane into a Fed Ex
building in Memphis.
1994: A pilot stole a Cessna and tried to crash it into the White
House. He instead hit a tree on the White House grounds, not far
from Clinton's bedroom.
1995: An Islamic fundamentalist group hijacked an Air France flight
and loaded the plane with 27 tons of fuel in Marseilles as a way to
turn it into an incendiary bomb when they crashed it into the
Eiffel tower. This plan was thwarted when Special Forces stormed
the craft before it could leave Marseilles.
1995: Abdul Hakim Murad confessed to planting timed explosive
devices on eleven US airline flights in an attempt to create a
"multiple attack" event (as outlined in the "too outrageous"
Terrorism 2000 report). The same terrorist group also planned to
crash on airplane into CIA headquarters in Langley, Virginia, and
another into the Pentagon (but Condi didn't dream anyone would ever
try such a thing in 2001!). This scheme was not a wild and fevered
plot. It was in the advanced planning stages — to the point
where
specific flights had already been selected. Murad himself was going
to be the suicide pilot who hit the CIA headquarters. Where did he
get his pilot training? In a US flight school.
The specifics of the "vague warning"
The most glaring lie Bush is using in his current spin is his claim
that the warnings he received were too vague to act upon. However,
the facts all by themselves scream "liar!"
From April 2001 right up to the day the WTC and Pentagon were
slammed urgent warnings of impending large-scale attacks by
terrorists had been issued to the Bush administration from multiple
sources. Germany, Egypt, Russia and Israel all delivered alerts
that accurately foretold the scale of the attack and that it would
involve a prominent landmark of some type. This would automatically
put the WTC and Pentagon on the short list, especially as both
landmarks had been targeted before (as mentioned above, the
Pentagon attack was averted).
The German intelligence agency BND warned the US and Israel both in
June that Middle Eastern terrorists were "planning to hijack
commercial aircraft to use as weapons to attack important symbols
of American and Israeli culture." This is hardly vague, and hardly
refers to an "overseas danger" to Americans (which of our prominent
landmarks is in Europe or Asia, pray tell?).
On June 13, Egypt sent an urgent warning that a plane stuffed with
explosives could be used as a weapon against George Bush. It was
assumed, incorrectly at that time, that the target could be the G-8
summit in Genoa, held in June 2001.
Vladimir Putin was so certain of the information he received in the
summer of 2001 of an impending attack that he personally instructed
Russian intelligence to tell Bush "in the strongest possible terms"
(his own words on September 15, 2001) of an impending attack
involving airports and government. The Russians told the CIA that
25 terrorist pilots had been specially trained to execute suicide
missions. It was around the same time that the FBI was receiving
tips about suspicious Arab men in US flight schools.
In August, 2001, the Israeli intelligence agency Mossad warned the
CIA and FBI that as many as 200 al Qaeda members were infiltrating
the US and planning "a major assault on the US" against "a
large-scale target" in a setting where Americans would be "very
vulnerable."
The NSA cracked bin Laden's encryption code by February
2001
Even before April the Bush administration HAD TO KNOW something was
up and probably had info that was even more specific than the
warnings given above. According to UPI correspondent Richard Sale,
by February 2001 the National Security Agency had broken Osama bin
Laden's communications encryption system. We know that the
encryption was broken because the Bush administration reported
AFTER 9/11 that it had intercepted encrypted calls bin Laden made
to his mother two days before the attack, saying "In two days,
you're going to hear big news, and you're not going to hear from me
for a while." If this message was intercepted before the attack,
what others were intercepted as well that the Bush administration
did NOT reveal? Most likely six months' worth of terrorist
planning.
The CIA knew of suspicious airline stock trades by September
7
Last but not least, the CIA knew a week before the attack WHICH
airlines were most likely to be hijacked. The Agency maintains an
advanced program called Promis, which monitors unusual stock market
activity, SPECIFICALLY as a way to anticipate potential terrorist
attacks. Promis provides 24-hour continuous real-time data on stock
market activity and the FBI and Justice Department have both
admitted that Promis was up and running all through the summer and
fall of 2001. So there is no doubt whatsoever that as early as
September 7, the CIA knew that something was going down and knew
which airlines were being targeted. Even a third-grader could have
put this information together with the long litany of warnings
above from foreign sources and come up with the conclusion that an
American Airlines or United Airlines craft was going to be hijacked
in the near future and most likely used to crash into a landmark,
quite possibly the World Trade Center.
More smoking facts
According to the official government web site of the Military
District of Washington the Pentagon ITSELF planned in detail how it
would respond to just such a scenario from October 24-26 2000. And
this was no low-level exercise, since it took place in the Office
of the Secretaries of Defense conference room. This story was run
in Unknown
News
and picked up the same day by Democrats.com
which
fortunately
kept a copy because within 24 hours the
story — along
with the entire Military District website — was scrubbed by
the
White House!
The model used in this simulation and the response plan was
developed by Don Abbott, who is the founder of FieldSoft, a company
that makes emergency-response software programs and systems,
including FDonScene. This program, according to the FieldSoft site,
"is the first — and only — fire service, software
application
specifically designed for incident commanders and their staff in
the field. The commercial off-the-shelf software (COTS) product is
designed to support in-field operations for any type of emergency
response. Basically, FDonScene is an automated COTS tool that
actively facilitates control and coordination of people,
procedures, events and other resources with the touch of a finger.
The application is specifically designed for fast, simple and easy
use by the incident commander, as well as members of the command
staff."
Bush was without doubt very familiar with FDonScene because it was
first endorsed by the Texas Fire Chiefs Association while he was
governor (1998). And, as the FieldSoft brochure mentions,
"FieldSoft has engineered software necessary to integrate FDonScene
with a consequence management system under development by the
Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA)." So this is
definitely a program well known to and used by the military.
Who Was Responsible for What on the Day of September 11,
2001?
The responsibility for protecting America's skies from terrorist
attack falls upon the North American Aerospace Defense Command
(NORAD, also simply called the "Space Command."). Established in
1958, NORAD is a US-Canadian command that provides warning of
missile and air attack against both member nations, according to
the organization's Web site. In the Eastern US, NORAD has at its
disposal, several Air Force Bases from which F-16s and F-15s can be
scrambled at a moment's notice. Among these bases are Otis AFB in
Cape Cod, Mass, Griffis AFB in Rome, NY, Andrews AFB just outside
DC, and Langley AFB in Eastern Virginia. NORAD's mission statement
on its website states:
"The Northeast Air Defense Air Sector's area of responsibility
covers more than one-half million square miles of airspace
including that over New York City; Washington, D.C.; Chicago and
other major metropolitan areas."
THE CHAIN OF COMMAND DURING A TERRORIST ATTACK:
A: The FAA reports hijackings and other threats to NORAD's First
Air Force Commander, who is based in Tyndall, FL. On Sept. 11, this
was Gen. Larry K. Arnold.
B: The First Air Force Commander then relays this info to The
Commander in Chief (CINC) of NORAD. On 9/11, this was Gen. Ralph
"Ed" Eberhardt.
C: In a grave situation where force seems warranted, the CINC
reports to the Commander in Chief ... George Bush. Also notified
are Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld and acting Chairman of the
Joint Chiefs of Staff, Richard B. Myers
The fact that NORAD was well aware that a major attack was a
possibility is made obvious by the command's planning, well before
Sept. 11, for a major exercise, slated for June 4, 2002. This is
from
a NORAD announcement:
"On June 4, 2002, the North American Aerospace Defense Command
(NORAD) will sponsor a multi-agency, bi-national exercise, Amalgam
Virgo 02, involving an airborne terrorism scenario over the United
States and Canada. The exercise, which was planned prior to the
events of Sept. 11, is designed to allow many US and Canadian
agencies to test, improve and validate their coordination and
operational procedures."
Regardless of what warnings Bush may have received, NORAD was well
aware of the threat to American skies.
THE PLANES
F-16: (Fighting Falcon) From USAF fact sheet: "The
F-16
Fighting Falcon is a compact, multi-role fighter aircraft. It is
highly maneuverable and has proven itself in air-to-air combat and
air-to-surface attack." The craft can go from zero to 500 mph in
about 2 minutes. Its top speed is about 1,500 mph, while its
typical cruising speed is nearly 600 mph. In other words, if a
plane had been scrambled from Andrews, just 10 miles away as the
crow (or F-16) flies, it would have been able to engage Flight 77
within 15 minutes from the time the call came in. To decide to
scramble a plane out of Langley seems to indicate just one thing:
help was intentionally delayed by 10 minutes.
F-15 (Eagle): From Air Force fact sheet: "The F-15
Eagle is
an all-weather, extremely maneuverable, tactical fighter designed
to permit the Air Force to gain and maintain air superiority in
aerial combat." This plane can reach an astounding maximum speed of
1,875 mph.
The time required from the notification to scramble to one of these
planes being airborne and at top speed is about 12-15 minutes.
THE PLAYERS
The Bush administration had in place, on Sept. 11 in the top five
posts relevant to the terrorist attack, men who totally support the
administration's vision for a "Star Wars" style military, for the
militarization of space and the merging of the military with
domestic law enforcement agencies into one big "Homeland Security"
entity. The five top players were: Larry K. Arnold, First Air Force
Commander of NORAD, Ralph "Ed" Eberhardt, Commander-in-Chief of
NORAD, Richard B. Myers, Donald Rumsfeld, Secretary of Defense, and
George W. Bush.
George W. Bush: Guess we don't need to add much
here, except
to say that Bush did not make it plain to the public at any time
since 9/11 that HE was the person that, according to the
established chain of command, called the final shots on 9/11.
Donald Rumsfeld: Of course, we know all about Mr.
Rumsfeld's
lust for power. He is a good pal of Ralph Eberhardt and, in fact,
in May of 2001, said Eberhardt was his first choice for chairman of
the Joint Chiefs of Staff. Rumsfeld is one of the architects of the
military-police complex.
Larry K. Arnold: Has, since 9/11, helped in the push
toward
the militarization of America. On February 20, 2002, he gave a talk
on "Homeland Defense" at the SpaceComm 2002 conference in Colorado
that had as its topic: "Shaping Information Operations and Space
Leadership", i.e., the extension of the military not just into the
"Homeland," but into space.
Ralph "Ed" Eberhardt: Eberhardt is a fanatical
supporter of
the missile defense scheme and the militarization of space. In
fact, in May, 2001, Eberhardt said in a speech that he believed
control of space was America's "destiny"! Eberhardt is also an
enthusiastic supporter of the merging of law enforcement and the
military and making technology such as military spy satellites
available to police.
Richard B. Myers: Less than three weeks after Bush
received
the now-famous memo of August 6, Myers was named by Bush to the top
post in the US military: Chairman of Joint Chiefs of Staff. This is
what a non-American (and thus less spun) news source (Pravda) had
to say about that appointment: "Gen. Myers was chosen for the job
precisely because his views are shared by both of his bosses,
President George W. Bush and Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld.
He is considered an active advocate of deploying the National
Missile Defense program." He told a news conference that he would
be working on the materialization of the idea "relentlessly" and
"with his sleeves rolled up." Right after 9/11, Myers was caught in
a lie when he claimed that no orders were given re: launching
aircraft until AFTER the Pentagon was hit, "We did scramble fighter
aircraft, AWACs, radar aircraft and tanker aircraft to begin to
establish orbits in case other aircraft showed up in the FAA system
that were hijacked. That order, to the best of my knowledge, was
after the Pentagon was struck." However, Marine Corps Maj. Mike
Snyder of NORAD told a Boston Globe reporter that the command had
been told about the hijacking 10 minutes before the first plane hit
the first World Trade Center tower. Snyder said the fighters
remained on the ground until after the Pentagon was hit, even
though "fighters routinely intercept aircraft."
Putting It All Together
Putting it all together with the hotlines that exist between these
offices, the time that it would take from the moment the FAA put in
its call to Arnold for Bush to respond (allowing two minutes tops
per communication) would have been roughly 6 minutes, plus or minus
as minute or two. The FAA called NORAD at 8:38 am about the first
hijacking. It was 6 minutes later — within the timing
estimates
made above — that two F-15s were ordered — by Bush
— to be
scrambled from Otis AFB. The evidence clearly shows that Bush had
decided AHEAD OF TIME how to handle Flight 77. The FAA call to
NORAD that Flight 77 had been hijacked was made at 9:24 — it
was at
9:24 that the order to scramble planes from LANGLEY was given.
This means this move had already been authorized by BUSH. How could
he have pre-authorized such a response unless he had 1) been told
about the plane some minutes before when it was obvious to NORAD's
radar system that the plane was headed for DC (NORAD did not
require an active transponder on Flight 77 to track the plane), or
2) Bush knew before 9/11 that a plane would be hitting the Pentagon
at around 9:45 am. Bush also had the authority, at all times after
8:44 (when he obviously gave his first orders re: Otis) to call for
an evacuation of the WTC and, at the LATEST, by 9:24 to order
federal buildings and landmarks in D.C. to be evacuated. Had he
made these orders, hundreds of lives would have been saved. Even if
the order to evacuate the second tower of the WTC had been made by
8:50, that precious 12 minutes would have made all the difference
to hundreds of WTC workers. The Pentagon workers would have had
nearly 15 minutes to evacuate if a call had come in by even
9:30.
Because he had seen the warnings throughout the summer, and the
last, strongest one on August 6, he should have been completely
prepared for every scenario he had been briefed on and read to take
decisive, urgent action to save lives. But he didn't. Instead, as
Pentagon workers sat at their desks or moved down the halls,
oblivious to the impending danger, at 9:29, Bush had just finished
reading the Hungry, Hungry Caterpillar and was getting ready to
announce that an "apparent" terrorist attack was underway.
Apparent?
But let's take a look for a moment at the bigger picture: From the
first, the plan of the Bush administration has been to extend
military power into space while creating a domestic police state in
the name of "Homeland Security. In this scheme, the line between
military and police would be blurred. Elements of the CIA, which
has traditionally worked more with the military, have now been
folded into the FBI, while yet more restrictions on the power of
the agencies over ordinary citizens have been removed. For a grim
picture of where Bush et al. were trying to take America as of
August, 2001, see The
Next
Battlefield by Jack Hitt. Here's an excerpt from
that
article:
The political attention devoted to national missile defense,
which is an updated version of President Reagan's Strategic
Defensive Initiative, has obscured its larger purpose. According to
the Strategic Master Plan, N.M.D. is but one part of a triad of
technologies — along with improved space surveillance and
anti-satellite offensive weaponry — that the Air Force hopes,
will
lead to total "space control." George Friedman, an intelligence
consultant and the author of "The Future of War," calls the
national missile defense plan a "Trojan horse" for the real issue:
the coming weaponization of space. The cost of expanding our space
assets is only now beginning to show itself. Many of the specific
systems for space have had their budgets increased in President
(G.W.) Bush's first defense-spending.
The three major proponents of this "new military": Richard B.
Myers, Ralph Eberhardt and Donald Rumsfeld.
However, in the summer of 2001, the American public's support for
the Bush administration's schemes, in general, was weak and waning
fast. In August, 2001 Bush's approval rating had slumped to under
50%. However, within just a few weeks of 9/11, with virtually no
opposition from Congress, Myers had been confirmed as Chairman of
the Joint Chiefs of Staff. By Nov. 2001, Homeland Security had been
established, and the Patriot Act been passed. By April 2002
Rumsfeld, Myers and Eberhardt had announced the formation of
NORTHCOM, the mega military complex that consolidated their power.
Here's an excerpt from an April 18, 2002 article in the Boston
Globe:
Air Force General Richard B. Myers, chairman of the Joint
Chiefs of Staff, who was responsible for drafting the new command
plan — and who calls the establishment of the new command the
most
significant structural change in his 37 years in uniform —
said
yesterday that the Northern Command (NORTHCOM) 'takes the various
homeland security missions being performed by various combatant
commanders and some agencies and puts them under one commander [to]
bring unity and focus to the mission.' Air Force General Ralph E.
Eberhardt is slated to head the new command, which will also
include oversight of NORAD and the territorial defense missions of
the JFCOM.
In short, 9/11 was used as a springboard for the pre-9/11 Bush
scheme. The steps taken in the name of Homeland Security that were
done in the name of 9/11 were actually already planned well before
that event. It was the event that made it possible to implement
them. If you want to get an idea of where this merger between the
military and law enforcement is headed, how about this statement
made by Ralph Eberhardt at the Space Symposium held in Colorado
Springs in early 2002: "Over time we can leverage our space assets
to support homeland security and law enforcement." So, for example,
does this mean the use of military satellites to spy on
citizens?
Now ponder this point: Since Bush took office, he has richly
rewarded every single person who helped him substantially, usually
with top posts or the legislation they wanted. After 9/11, we see
Myers and Eberhardt moving up into top posts of incredible power.
What were they being rewarded for?
Now, back to 9/11. The simple fact is, if Bush had not ignored the
August 6 (and earlier) warnings of terrorist strikes, and had
instead acted decisively and responsibly, the scenario that
unfolded on 9/11 would have been very different. First of all, on
high alert, the airports may have screened passengers more
carefully — some or all of the hijackers may have failed to
get
aboard their target aircraft. Secondly, if they had succeeded in
boarding the craft, the FAA would have been in a state of readiness
for a serious event. At 8:25 am Boston FAA would have immediately
called NORAD, who would have been in readiness, perhaps even with
preauthorized orders from Bush. The WTC would have been on high
alert from Aug. 6 on and an evacuation could have been undertaken
as early as 8:30 — time enough to save countless lives.
But instead, Bush did not warn the public. When called by NORAD, he
failed to respond in a way designed to save lives. In short, the
trail of smoke from the smoking gun leads ultimately, and
unavoidably, back to George W. Bush.
SOURCE
If you haven't read
the following, DO SO
NOW. The facts hint strongly at LIES & CONSPIRARACY. I have
always maintained this link in my sidebar and URGE EVERYONE to read
it. The pictures are gone now, but the words are EXTREMELY
IMPORTANT in understanding WHAT REALLY HAPPENED on September 11,
2001.
"It was an interesting day." - george W. bush
To make things
really lengthy on this
post (yeah, I know, but do you think that I think anyone reads all
of this?), I feel compelled to include part of my blog of September
8, 2005. It includes many things I haven't spoken about or pointed
to today and its all certainly still pertinent, especially the
Stanley Hilton interview on the Alex Jones show. What is amazing is
that ABSOLUTELY NOTHING HAS BEEN DONE. But then again, if you think
about it, the alleged perpetrators ARE THE ONES IN CHARGE OF
EVERYTHING!!!
BUT, if they ever lose control I doubt that there will be anywhere
to hide. UNLESS THEY EMPLOY OSAMA bIN LADEN to teach them his MOST
EXCELLENT HIDING TACTICS.
The 9/11 LIARS Of 2001 (September 8, 2005)
"In my line of work you got to keep repeatin' things over and over
and over again for the truth to sink in, to kind of catapult the
propaganda."
--george W. bush, LIAR
"Effective propaganda must limit its points of a few and these
points must be repeated until even the last member of the audience
understands what is meant by them... It must limit itself to a few
themes and repeat them incessantly. Each change must never affect
the content of propaganda, rather must always draw the same
conclusions....the rank and file are usually much more primitive
than we imagine. Propaganda must therefore always be essentially
simple and repetitious...The most brilliant propagandist technique
will yield no success unless one fundamental principle is borne in
mind constantly... it must confine itself to a few points and
repeat them over and over.”
"
--joseph goebbels, NAZI MINISTER OF PROPAGANDA
It was just four years ago today. The BIG QUESTION still
remains. Was it treason or was it gross negligence??? Either way,
most of our country is personally feeling the effects of george W.
bush. Yet to this day I still see the smoking 1988 Chrysler mini
van, eaten away by rust, dirty windows, full of little ones with
the dreaded w-04 bumper sticker proudly displayed. These people are
lost. These people have "signed their own death certificate", but
worse- THEY'VE SOLD THEIR CHILDREN TO THE NEO-CONS, who would turn
their lives in a heartbeat.
“Start a small war. Pick a country where there is
justification
you can jump on, go ahead and invade.”
--dick Cheney, CROOK
"It is the leaders of the country who determine the policy and it
is always a simple matter to drag the people along, whether it is a
democracy, or a fascist dictatorship, or a parliament, or a
communist dictatorship. Voice or no voice, the people can always be
brought to the bidding of the leaders. That is easy. All you have
to do is tell them they are being attacked, and denounce the
peacemakers for lack of patriotism and exposing the country to
danger. It works the same in any country."
--herman Goering, NAZI
Bu$h
Family Babysitter Killed + Marvin Bush, Enron
Marvin
Bush - 9/11 Encyclopedia
Something's
Rotten in Dubai: The Ports Deal UAE
Killer
Bush Sr.
Cline HINCKLEY Halpe Nancy's
Independent International
Truth
Commission On 9/11
Questions
on
plane crashes JFK + Spooks at Holyok
Ken Lay on Trial: Why are the Media Forgetting the Bush/Cheney
...
HarkenGate,
the
File
Offutt - Warren Buffett - George Bush - September 11
Quotes
from George
Bush our Presidnet in Thief 2006 Bushisms
Bush
Humor -
Political satire - photos
catalytic converter: An Email from COINTELPRO and Shocking 9/11
...
Stanley
Hilton Lawsuit - 9/11Review
Do
Turkeys Enjoy Thanksgiving - 9/11Review
.
.
.
.